Anonymous ID: ac953c Jan. 4, 2018, 7:19 a.m. No.241252   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1260 >>1264 >>1273

>>241234

>>241250

This guy pleaded with trump to call out the Clinton's publicly about this, because no one ever would.

Right after this, he rekt Hillary at the red dinner with his Haitian village joke, and mentioned Haiti at debates and in the media.

This was a moment when I realized that he was about as red-pilled as they come, and nothing was off limits. It was insane for him to just openly take shots about Hillary stealing Haitian villages.

Do anyone seriously think he's just gonna let that go?

Anonymous ID: ac953c Jan. 4, 2018, 8:22 a.m. No.241571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1789

>>238914

>>241484

Q has only used the MONDAY name two other times

>see pics

It would probably valuable to go look at any news and Q posts that following monday to see if it was pointing to something then, and if we should be expecting something this time.

 

Also, this may not be related to "MONDAY," but the "tangent" line got me thinking.

We've been told that the MAP is read continually, think circle, think multiple paths, etc.

Could tangent be indicating that as they are in their circular info gathering and decision making process, that is repeated over and over while watching the enemy (game theory), they have struck out on a tangent, because something changed? Here are some past thoughts thoughts that may be relevant to this idea.

>>207527

I feel like I've been scratching at the edges of what the MAP really is for a while now, like I have the abstract concept down but I just can't see the specific methodology they are using to apply it.

Also see my other post regarding use of the MAP moving forward

>>237835

 

I'm starting to think that one of the most useful things we could do is to create a timeline of real news, tweets, events, etc. Then place markers on that timeline where Q posts correlate, or were confirmed. All the crumbs were dropped out of order and basically all at once.

The way reality unfolds shows us which pieces of the map are active and relevant, sort of like reading a map that says "turn left at the spooky tree."

That's a bit useless on it's own, but if you are walking down the path and are looking for a spooky tree, now it will jump out at you, and you will take the correct turn.

Another way to think of the map is a bit like one of those guided museum tours you rent out, where they give you some hardware and headphones. You have a huge trove of information, all that is a bit difficult to appreciate out of context. However when you get to the painting/sculpture, you look for the code to enter and bam! Instant historical context and information relating to that real life item.

 

Sorry for jumbled rants, sometimes the flow of information moves too quick for me to slow down and organize my thoughts and communicate them in a less autistic way, and I'd rather toss them out there then let them slide in my memory.