Anonymous ID: a5c22c Nov. 26, 2017, 6:14 p.m. No.2505   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9922

>>2472

>Is it real?

I honestly think it is, but you should go through it yourself and form your own conclusions.

 

>Is it worth reading?

Definitely. Can you beat an enemy you don't understand? This, in my opinion, allows one to have the (mostly) correct perspective about…"things".

 

I will be around here, if you happen to have other questions.

Anonymous ID: a5c22c Nov. 26, 2017, 6:40 p.m. No.2625   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7093

>>2472

I should add as to "why" that the size of the document shows it was not a simple troll attempt.

 

This AMA took more than 2 years. What kind of autism one needs to keep going for such a long time?

 

If you read it, you will clearly see that the OP was quite sane.

 

It is legit.

Anonymous ID: a5c22c Nov. 27, 2017, 11:42 a.m. No.4995   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5071 >>5080

>>4912

>And yet his way of thinking is wrong. It is an abomination, a perversion of the purpose of Creation and the intent of its Creator.

And what makes you think you truly understand the purpose of creation, and the intent of the creator?

 

Is it not true that the creation IS the intent of the creator? In other words, isn't the operational rules/existential algorithms of the creation(Universal/Natural Law as OP states) the intent of the creator?

 

OPs central point in that document is: one must follow the Natural Law. If they indeed do, and the above paragraph is true, then wouldn't that make them right in their cause, as they are following "God's Will"?

 

Also, again by Natural Law, you empower them by your free will, with your bad choices. At least most of "us". What violation of creator's intent exist here?

 

Though i agree that most of it is caused by bad parenting and education, thus it is not just on on an individual level. But justice itself is an illusion, is it not?

 

The only justice that exists is of the powerful.

Anonymous ID: a5c22c Nov. 30, 2017, 8 a.m. No.14679   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8228

>>7340

> when they haven't even scratched the surface.

  • when they have only scratched the surface

Noticed now. Odd.

 

>>9874

I think this is classic disinfo. Some to hook people in, but mostly deception. So not compeletely worthless, but discernment is required.

 

This is OP. Bump.