Anonymous ID: bcda84 Jan. 4, 2018, 11:53 a.m. No.242803   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2836

>>242717

 

My thinking behind Q crumb

 

EO_CLASSIFIED_WH[ -6713A]

 

Is along the lines of the below, because of the early crumbs dropped by Q relating to trade secrets:

 

3 Trade Secrets Throughout the World § 31:14

Trade Secrets Throughout the World | November 2017 Update

Chapter 31. The Philippines

Lorna Patajo-Kapunan and Troy A. Luna *

§ 31:14. Maintaining the confidentiality of trade secrets during review by government agencies and litigation—Agency review

 

In reviews conducted by administrative agencies, Section 7(c) of Republic Act No. 6713, otherwise known as the "Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officers," prohibits any public official or employee from using or divulging

confidential or classified information officially known to them by reason of their office and not made available to the public, either to further private interest or give undue advantage to anyone, or to prejudice the public interest.

 

Republic Act 3019, the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, further declares as unlawful the act of a public official or employee in divulging valuable information of a confidential character acquired by his office, or by him on account of

his official position, to unauthorized persons in advance of its authorized release date.

Anonymous ID: bcda84 Jan. 4, 2018, 12:45 p.m. No.243174   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>242981

 

It did get lost in the POT stream.

 

Leaning towards this line of thinking and incorporating the trade/state secrets information. Will research this aspect more.

Anonymous ID: bcda84 Jan. 4, 2018, 1:13 p.m. No.243364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3407

>>243330

I disagree.

>>241811

Left too many additional questions, and I do not believe it was solved. There are several additional avenues which need to be explored before you commit the /CBTS/ to this being "solved". Expand your thinking beyond one theory.

Anonymous ID: bcda84 Jan. 4, 2018, 1:24 p.m. No.243469   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>243407

>>241811

Is not fully vetted, when you only consider one avenue. We are not even 24 hours past Qs post, and you deem it vetted? That is not how research works. When you only skim for facts on g00gle and not fully investigate; that is not research.

Open your mind to different theories, ffs. Are we not trying to defeat streamlined thinking in America?