A missile has a guidance system to allow it to steer and change course towards its intended target, and also a propulsion system that self drives it. In the head of the missile is some kind of sensor array that is used to track the target (for instance an Infra Red optical sensor for a heat seeking missile). This is mounted on a gimbal, and moves to orient the array with the target.

Missiles can track their target using Proportional Navigation; the concept known to mariners of Constant Bearing Angle. If two ships are approaching each other and their angle of approach remains the same, but only their distance or range is decreasing, then they will collide. Both SpaceX and Tesla utilize these technologies. SpaceX uses it in their Dragon Eye Navigation System. Tesla uses similar technology in the Tesla Traffic-Aware Cruise Control (TACC). Both systems are the EYE for guidance. Proportional guidance can be either used to avoid a collision (Tesla) or to cause one (SpaceX missile).

Tesla rockets also have remote guidance capability.

>The Falcon 9 is composed of 2 different stages, one to get out of the atmosphere for the most part, and the other to deliver the payload to its rendezvous point. The first stage has been modified to not consume all of the fuel that it carries. At separation, the first stage of the rocket turns around and propels itself back to earth. It then uses a remote guidance system to control it and land it on a barge that SpaceX has specifically designed and made for.

archive.is/WqZHk#selection-635.0-635.462

>>247275

Q mentioned 'missle' 3 times. The recent SpaceX rocket did not reenter. They allowed the 1st stage to be destroyed. Remember, also, that NK launched a missile that landed on one of their own cities (Red October).

When SpaceX launched, Musk twatted "Nuclear UFO North Korea" or to that effect. Q said "message received". Then POTUS twatted that not only is his button bigger, but that it WORKS. Could it be that we sabatoged the guidance systems of all SpaceX based NK missiles? Meaning that if they dare fire them at us, we will just re-aim them back to their own country (Red October)?

This was their leverage. They could strike the US. However if they can't reliably launch an attack, then we captured their flag, the game is over.

>>247299

Sorry, Q said "message back". Q mentioned that there are double meanings. "I" was confirmed to be Iridium. This was the marker for the Iridium Communications Satellite launch on a SpaceX rocket. So the missing I refers to this exact launch. However a double meaning is that this rocket was not recovered. SpaceX may have lost some of their guidance ability.