>>247734
Not stealing your work, but adding some sauce. You get the credit for this.
[J-Go_dX)-2-8
>J Gold and Associates Doc, Chapters 2-8.
Title to above: "Android in the Business Environment: Is it Safe?" Note the question mark.
Sauce: jgoldassociates.com/White_Papers/Android_in_the_Business_Environment_Whitepaper.pdf
Everything has meaning.
The above is the topic of this post. So everything that follows supports the above assertion. No sauce, because no code.
Who is AMB Matlock?
>Article in the Observer has Matlock referencing Betteridge's Law: Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered with "no."
Sauce: observer.com/2017/03/ambassador-james-matlock-russia-trump-hysteria/
YES.
The answer to the headline (is Android safe?) is NO.
No sauce, just logical conclusion from the above.
I think the above explains the first part of Q's message. What follows is mostly speculation.
/[RR-out][P_pers]
>Start of new topic (note the open square bracket)
RR is Sessions' assistant. Rod "Red stone" (translation of his last name). He is either not out (slash from markup languages) or he is part of the first leg of the cabal triangle.
[P_Pers]โฆ maybe he's part of the P that directs GS? Lots of other speculation out there. Secondary topic, related to RR-out? From same source or with same conclusion?
EO_CLASSIFIED_WH[ -6713A]
This one is either the law preventing the revelation of tax returns by parties who see them for work purposes (see photo).
EO 6713 is not listed on the FDR EO site.
presidency.proxied.lsit.ucsb.edu/executive_orders.php?year=1934&Submit=DISPLAY
Note the gap from 6651 to 6750โฆ exactly 100? Coincidence?
SIG_con_MAR39sv3665BECD
SIG is either Special Intereest group or SIG (military term for electronic intelligence is Sigint)
con is either convenor of the SIG or maybe it is from the root mean "with"โฆ
MAR39sv Remittance transaction?
BECD
No good speculation yet.
What do you fags think?
Q
>We don't have a link to above for the rest