Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 3:28 a.m. No.247634   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

From Q, re: 6713

 

If you check the date 1967 January 3, you find that Jack Ruby died that day and Reagan was sworn in as Governor of California for the first time.

 

"I'm a believer" by the Monkees was the hit song.

 

"The Jury Returns" was the best seller.

 

Maybe nothing here, but just more trivia that might trigger something in someone else.

 

onthisday.com/date/1967/january/3

takemeback.to/03-January-1967

worldhistoryproject.org/1967/1/3/reagan-is-sworn-in-as-governor-of-california

 

And for real trivial trivia, JRR Tolkien celebrated his 75th birthday on that day.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 3:57 a.m. No.247695   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>247690

 

Rumor here is that MbS is actually a reformer. So if KSA makes nice with Israel, most other not-as-hardcore countries could do so also.

 

Then it's only Hamas, Daesh, Fatah, MB, al Qaeda, and a few other miscreants to worry about.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 4:11 a.m. No.247715   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7734

>>247700

 

I like almost all, but the BECD is not explained at all, nor are the three spaces. Three people involved in the leak?

 

The slash before [RR-out] seems to be "not" from markupsโ€ฆ so maybe he's not out because he is releasing the files to the House?

 

P-Pers?

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 4:50 a.m. No.247826   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7875 >>7910 >>7994

>>247734

 

Not stealing your work, but adding some sauce. You get the credit for this.

 

[J-Go_dX)-2-8

 

>J Gold and Associates Doc, Chapters 2-8.

Title to above: "Android in the Business Environment: Is it Safe?" Note the question mark.

 

Sauce: jgoldassociates.com/White_Papers/Android_in_the_Business_Environment_Whitepaper.pdf

 

Everything has meaning.

 

The above is the topic of this post. So everything that follows supports the above assertion. No sauce, because no code.

 

Who is AMB Matlock?

 

>Article in the Observer has Matlock referencing Betteridge's Law: Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered with "no."

 

Sauce: observer.com/2017/03/ambassador-james-matlock-russia-trump-hysteria/

 

YES.

 

The answer to the headline (is Android safe?) is NO.

No sauce, just logical conclusion from the above.

 

I think the above explains the first part of Q's message. What follows is mostly speculation.

 

/[RR-out][P_pers]

 

>Start of new topic (note the open square bracket)

 

RR is Sessions' assistant. Rod "Red stone" (translation of his last name). He is either not out (slash from markup languages) or he is part of the first leg of the cabal triangle.

 

[P_Pers]โ€ฆ maybe he's part of the P that directs GS? Lots of other speculation out there. Secondary topic, related to RR-out? From same source or with same conclusion?

 

EO_CLASSIFIED_WH[ -6713A]

This one is either the law preventing the revelation of tax returns by parties who see them for work purposes (see photo).

 

EO 6713 is not listed on the FDR EO site.

 

presidency.proxied.lsit.ucsb.edu/executive_orders.php?year=1934&Submit=DISPLAY

Note the gap from 6651 to 6750โ€ฆ exactly 100? Coincidence?

 

SIG_con_MAR39sv3665BECD

 

SIG is either Special Intereest group or SIG (military term for electronic intelligence is Sigint)

con is either convenor of the SIG or maybe it is from the root mean "with"โ€ฆ

 

MAR39sv Remittance transaction?

 

BECD

No good speculation yet.

 

What do you fags think?

 

Q

 

>We don't have a link to above for the rest

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 4:56 a.m. No.247851   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

When was the cell phone ban announced? I can only find a 3:00 pm update.

 

Q's first half definitely supports this announcement as shown above. Did Q post precede the announcement? If so, we have more "Q is legit" confirmation.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 5:06 a.m. No.247875   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7883 >>7887 >>7910

>>247826

 

TLDR version:

 

J Gold published a paper on Android security asking if they were safe?

Amb Matlock referenced Betteridges law which states headlines with a question mark are answered "No."

Androids not safe

 

Explains the WH 8:00 announcement about no personal cell phones.

 

Q's post was "01/04/18 (Thu) 09:43:04"

 

What is that in Eastern time? If before 8:00 am, then it confirms another legitimate Q forecast.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 5:12 a.m. No.247882   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24787

Q posted around midnight, eight hours before the announcement.

 

Q shows more insider knowledge. Why did this matter? Just proving his bona fides? Why?

 

To prove his next bit is trueโ€ฆ but next bit (starts with /[RR-out] has not yet been decoded.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 5:15 a.m. No.247895   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>247886

 

It's about 7:00 amโ€ฆ that's oil rig crew change time. There are about a million drilling rigs in the GOM. One of the main crew change points is out of Houma (pronounced Home-ah)

 

Another is Morgan City. Many, many helicopters this time of day, nearly every day.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 5:19 a.m. No.247910   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7945 >>8104 >>8138

>>247887

>>247826

>>247875

 

Middle one is the sauced version (long).

 

Another anon did the heavy lifting, I just sauced and wrote the conclusion.

 

This says that the second half of the post is what mattersโ€ฆ and it is not yet decoded. First half proved "Hey, I am on the inside." Second half should have a "real" message, or this was a waste of time.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 5:38 a.m. No.247992   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>247978

 

It is cheaper to fly out the crew, because you are paying both the crewman and his relief during the flight. Get them out. Get them to work. Crew boats are much more rare since about 2000. Work boats are out there all over the place.

Anonymous ID: 0a1afb Jan. 5, 2018, 5:45 a.m. No.248020   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>248000

 

Well, I'm probably wasting my time, but if you were to pull your head out of your ass and read the sauced version (it's one of the links), you'll see that all of the pieces are explained and fit together.

 

Otherwise, give a better explanation,with sauce or just KYS.