I've been thinking about the timing of the Session's announcement around federal response to States with legal cannabis.

Why do it now, when other more pressing matters are at hand?

Then it hit me: SANCTUARY CITIES.

It's Trump's opening gambit for negotiations to rid the nation of these cities. Focus being California, who would loose up to $1bn in tax revenue, a sum of money that no bankrupt State would be willing to loose.

You fix the sanctuary cities and we might reconsider the Federal position on legal weed.

>>247766

I've personally been in favor of legalisation of drugs but when I read that Soros had been the main funder for this, it made me think why they are driving this.

It could just be money thing but part,of me thinks it's a Soma for the masses, keep the population drugged and suggestible move.

>>247994

If POTUS is serious about a Trillion dollar infrastructure investment what better model to take than Roosvelt's New Deal.

National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, that's associated with this EO is the foundation of that initiaitive. Makes sense .

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Industrial_Recovery_Act_of_1933