Ok guys I have a crazy idea and I hope I don't get shit on for it but I think it might help the group enormously. There is a website that allows it's users to submit questions, then each user has an equal amount of "gravity" to pull a "lens" over the answer.

The result is a hivemind, focused in on a particular question and collectively using their intellect to select the most probable answer. With a group like ours, we could answer quite a few things and it gives me goosebumps thinking about it.

It's called UNU. I'm sure many of you have already heard about it and some of you are probably going to call me a faggot for bringing it up for some reason but this shit has worked for sports betting and all kinds of shit.

Here's a video for those who don't know about UNU.

https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=TkAoRUHs5F0

https:// unu.ai/

I really think this could help the group focus in on subjects, bring clarity to what's important, and truly I think help us answer some questions that have remained unanswered.

>>248223

Basically. The only catch for me is that I would say 30-50 person minimum to really get the thing working. Any less and its just a small group of people fighting over the "lens" and making shitty questions.

This group is different, and everyone here seems focused and motivated to help. We all have seen Q verify himself one way or another, and when you know there is an insider leaking the kind of info he is, it's hard to ignore it. I really think this could help us solve a few things if we get enough people involved. Luckily it has a guest function like discord so joining requires nothing.

>>248238

Hey BO, just wondering what your thoughts are on my idea>>248215

This could legitimately help us.

>>248251

and to (you) my fellow cock holster. Any input on the idea?

>>248319

We would have to have a mod or admin over at UNU on our side in order to kick out any people suspect of distorting the results on purpose. Then again, all things are a matter of collective opinion so silencing someone (or x amount people) would possibly harm the end result.

More people=better results so long as we know a majority of the people aren't shills, which I am confident we can do. Even if they do show up, it would stand out because questions would be side tracked, their cursor would constantly be shown going 'against' the collective, and I'm sure in the chatbox they would be saying stupid shit that makes them a glow stick.