Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:05 p.m. No.251035   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1062 >>1076 >>1078

>>250944

Easier to make a destructive nuke by far than an EMP….

And the myth that atom bombs carry even nomnimal EMP ability == BS.

 

Proof: Watch "VIDEO FOOTAGE" of hundreds of detonations across varied elevations, never once seen the VIDEO camera fail (which uses a SEMICONDUCTOR Charged-coupled-device for image reception).

 

Ever ask yourself why this footage exists when no special care has ever been noted to protect camera from anything other than the "blast effects"?

 

EMP's are real- Lightning and mass coronal events can introduce them, but atomic EMP is very minimal impact at best to the "grid".

Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:16 p.m. No.251104   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>251078

Vidcon tube is what you refer to. It was phased out quickly during early nuke testing.

MOST of the videos since 60s are CCD based.

 

Explain how video camera work EVERY TIME but nothing else is supposed to?

Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:21 p.m. No.251141   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1299

>>251076

Lets continue on the EMP rampage:

Remember the days of the little EMP BLASTER that was supposed to stop a car by jetting underneath it and "popping" the electronics?

 

Why did that never come to market?

 

EVEN from the VERY SHORT distance of GROUND to ECM (engine ignition control electronics) the tests hardly worked.

Deemed useless.

 

In fact, it is better to use a microwave cannon.

(google that)

Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:32 p.m. No.251215   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>1225 >>1301

>>251190

I have done extensive research into EMP's but anyone here can say that without proof. I am pointing out that to create an pulse large enough to take out a section of grid would require billions of megaton discharge. Not worth it. Rather use the bomb accordingly.

 

Now remember EMP and EMI are different.

EMI can be introduced with HAARP. Localized.

Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:41 p.m. No.251278   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>251241

Jet is shielded well, they get hit by lightning all the time.

Some sensitive equipment with antennae may get burned.

 

But once again, the pulse would be so great to discharge that amount of electron energy it would have to be within several hundred feet.

And that close would blow up the plane by bomb impact alone.

 

Natural occurrence of emp like coronal discharge is more along what they try to "sell us" as being man made possible.

(that's where earth gets hit by cosmic lightning)

Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:44 p.m. No.251310   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>251241

I live offgrid in a shielded house.

(solar panels are thin film on aluminum film, on metal roof.)

 

I did my homework to protect against lightning mostly.

 

And had to start observing not once did any atom blast burn out anything on record, so it makes me ask who started the rumor about EMPs and why?

"Keep em scared" sound familiar?

"global warming" etc.

Anonymous ID: 0b9df2 Jan. 5, 2018, 2:46 p.m. No.251340   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>251301

To get that millivolt difference across a junction to effectively burn it out, you must overcome DISTANCE. for that- you can calculate like ERP on a ham transmitter.

So what distance, and how tiny the un-sheilded semiconductor are we targeting.