>>248746
These last 3 Q posts are confusing as many have pointed out. Why no super secure trips?
Anyway
>How do you destroy the most POWERFUL country in the world?
Destroying the value of the currency by speculation worked for other countries but it doesn't for America because the US dollar is the world standard. So you have to drain the wealth of America by hemorrhaging it's money on social programs, welfare, food stamps, abortions, bailouts, foreign aid to no limit. However Americans produces so much wealth that it has not broken yet. This is done via democrat policies with bought politicians via lobbyists
Remove America's influence around the world. Do this by halting america's production. America conquered the world with products made in america. Blue jeans, coca cola, etc. Now few things are made in America. Corporations use america's ingenuity to make their products overseas and sell to americans instead, draining the economy further. international corporate policy is largely determined by republicans who are bought by the cabal or lobbied by corporate interests.
Divide and conquer from within, male vs female, young vs old, black vs white, wealthy vs poor, educated vs not educated, a system where virtually every dividing line you can think of is exploited to pit people against eachother. This is done by the MSM and social media who are controlled by hostile share holders
Cult members are placed inside Hollywood and Washington and all maintain things from within and this is how America is controlled. The only thing left is to corrupt the military. Cult members have to become officers in order to command the rank and file and with a corrupt commander in chief they can do anything. Any problems are taken care of easily with orders that are followed by well trained and loyal soldiers. Seal team six, 7/10 crash. Hold the world at hostage with the US military and it's aresnal.
>SA was strategic.
>“We know” “Do as we say or face consequences”
I would hate to think SA is being controlled now with threats instead of simply having offered a better deal. I figured SA rulers are more interested in self preservation than bending to the threat of Trump and team. Maybe I am misinterpreting that last part, though