dChan
Anonymous ID: 03580b Jan. 5, 2018, 5 p.m. No.252476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2484

>>252370

 

Has Q ever referred to himself as "we" ?

I don't recall Q ever using personal pronouns in Q posts.

This would be evidence that tonight's Q is an fake.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Anonymous ID: 03580b Jan. 5, 2018, 5:18 p.m. No.252632   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>252598

>And they did it in Chicago. No way are they clean.

 

Plus, look at the management team of Loop …

Loop was used to bankroll Jugears before Geffen and the bigger $$ got behind him in 2008.

Loop got a return on their early $$ backing … and then some.

Anonymous ID: 03580b Jan. 5, 2018, 5:46 p.m. No.252822   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2850 >>2899 >>2911

>>252698

 

I'm with the BO on this.

Those Q posts use 1st person personal pronouns to describe Q/Q-Team.

I looked at the map.

I haven't seen this writing style from Q … Helpers have posted using personal pronouns when referring to themselves, but Q has not.

This is a major change in writing styles.

 

IMO, those posts from today were not Q.

 

BO : If you have the ability to correct this mess with Q, I urge you to do so asap.

Not your fault, but please sort it if you can so we can get back on track. Thank you.

Anonymous ID: 03580b Jan. 5, 2018, 5:58 p.m. No.252910   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2937

>>252850

 

Except for "We all sincerely appreciate the work you do.", the other uses of "we" are a more global reference, as in we (the country/patriots) …. Not we, Q team.

 

BO proved his identity with the edits (multiple times).

Real Q knows how to create a new trip and verify it, as he's previously done on /pol.

I believe real Q knows of this fuckery and will re-establish a connection.

 

I have no dog in this fight.

I just want it resolved.

I stand by my post.

Relax. Have a Thorazine.