Anonymous ID: 371309 Jan. 5, 2018, 5:07 p.m. No.252540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2559 >>2562

>>252515

Is this not that famewhore who went to YouTube after having claimed to have been a baker once?

I remember knowing not to trust her/take her seriously.

Correct me if I'm mistaken here, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 371309 Jan. 5, 2018, 5:29 p.m. No.252712   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2728 >>2806

>>252690

To be fair, she is trying to imply she has some "insider knowledge" of sorts.

Saying "BO and I have been under internet attack" or whatever. And then implying "we've handled it." like she was there at ground zero.

She's likely just making herself sound more important so her viewers think she's…ahem…"hot shit", to quote Skippy.

Anonymous ID: 371309 Jan. 5, 2018, 5:48 p.m. No.252839   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2891

>>252779

Been considering this myself, though I never considered the UN aspect.

I saw it as more as any public figure puppet that will stand a chance of rallying normies into an anti-Trump/save-Lynn's-ass movement will be being "shipped" around, as it were.

Good analysis, Anon.

Anonymous ID: 371309 Jan. 5, 2018, 5:56 p.m. No.252897   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>252806

I'm not chastising the girl. I think it just makes me wary of her when she goes from disseminating information this board has gathered to being the "famefagbaker" who, before you know it, is Hillary arriving under "heavy sniper fire".

But I agree, the info and the Anons are what will count in the end.

Alex Jones/Bill Hicks conundrum, I suppose.