>>252635
>>252582
This was posted a little while ago:
OK, on Nov 21, in the St Charles House of Horrors blind (URL below), it states that one of the masterminds behind the St Charles house got into an argument with his dad, who was one of the richest men in the world, and that the dad was killed in a "freak" accident "this week", but it was no accident. At the time, people were having trouble figuring out who the rich dead guy was… some guessed a Texan who most people have never heard of.
http://www.crazydaysandnights.net/2017/11/todays-blind-items-st-charles-house-of.html
The Rothschild house plane accident happened on Nov 17th. I think the St Charles blind was pointing to the fact that Jacob Rothschild was killed in that plane crash. AGAIN, at the time of the crash, there were multiple news reports that Jacob was "feared" to have died, and then there was silence. AFAIK, no one ever said "Oh, never mind… Jacob wasn't on that helicopter". It just went quiet.
If one of the masterminds of the St Charles house was Nat Rothschild (Jacob's son), then Enty is saying that Jacob WAS killed on the 17th, and this current blind is stating that they have been successful in preventing the news of the death from escaping. Again, it supposedly wasn't an accident. The crash was intentional.
Given that the St Charles blind states that the house has been owned by the same organization for hundreds of years, and has been a den of iniquity for movers and shakers "almost 100 years", how many organizations/families have even been that important for that long? I don't buy Illuminati baloney, but the Rothschilds have been wealthy and involved in world politics for centuries. If you want to call them Illuminati, be my guest… I'm not going there.
Putting these 2 blinds together, I'm saying that the St Charles house has been associated with/owned by the Rothschilds, and that's one of the reasons why father-in-law could have brought down hundreds of producers and directors. They have the audio/video. The current blind is saying that, instead of there being a cover story for why Jacob Rothschild is dead, there is simply no news at all. Here's a story about there being gaps in the local air traffic control on the day of the crash because of "staff shortages". Maybe a couple of controllers were paid to call in sick, to make it look more like an accident.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/11/17/aylesbury-mid-air-crash-fatalities-feared-afteraircraft-helicopter/
Try to prove me wrong. Show that Jacob is still alive.
Some things don't fit, like the reference to "the fire". There was a fire after the crash, but it was in the woods where the wreckage landed.
4:26 PM