Anonymous ID: 16fb00 Jan. 5, 2018, 6:08 p.m. No.252997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3027 >>3350 >>3388 >>3427

>>252969

(excerpts/reposts from previvous):

 

"problem/reaction/solution?

 

-fear of tripcrack (legit fear, ok, but current trip still valid)

 

-enter the supertrip, which seems to make sense to everyone, but Q does not use

 

…but hey, wait a minute: i remember so many comments asking why Q would not use more secure trips from the start? That would make sense. To us. Would it to Q? Maybe not.

 

If you're the only supersecure person in a crowd, you may be "hidden" but you stand out otherwise: for example, if you go do your groceries in a mask, or full burka, no one will see your face but they sure will see you…

 

We know Q could have used more secure techniques from the start, but didn't. Do we know if he can tell before using the new securetrip what's in that code exactly? Remember the trickery going on with POTUS twitter account, and attempt to insert codes to track/identify/etc?

 

Now we know, regardless of the debacle, that he's not using the supertrip.

 

..and through all this, what his current trip (now paused) said sure makes sense to me. But it implicates BO and mods, though. How do they react? With absolute statements, calling Q fag, claiming truth, bringing little to no evidence, and deleting controversial posts."

 

///post replying:

 

"The thing nobody has considered (at least not that I've seen) is that the super secure trip may create more problems than it solves. You've pointed out a few and I'll add another. The last time the trip was changed it created a clustercuck that had to be over come because it did not work across all the devices that Q needs to use. Could be even more complicated now.

 

Q can contact the BO if he chooses, if he don't, trust he knows best. There are wiser forces at work here than what we need to be worried about.

 

Dig, Meme or Pray. Or do all three. All are possible without a new Q drop. Peace."

 

 

>>252821

>>252885

>>252959

Anonymous ID: 16fb00 Jan. 5, 2018, 6:11 p.m. No.253017   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>252999

 

i think we can all agree it was the real Q that said repeatedly

>archive everything

 

/also be wary of those claiming consensus in such a time of crisis, bro

Anonymous ID: 16fb00 Jan. 5, 2018, 6:20 p.m. No.253092   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3119 >>3145

>>253027

except posts are getting deleted, so no work is safe…

 

Why destroy the evidence, the very source, if arguments against it are valid?

Why would someone do that?

Such a small number of posts, taking so little space compared to all the waste… and legit Q told us repeatedly to archive everything, archive everything, archive everything…

 

I just had a small problem with erasing obvious troll posts, but understood then. But deleting the posts that go against your narrative, that implicate you personally? Why would someone do that?

Anonymous ID: 16fb00 Jan. 5, 2018, 6:41 p.m. No.253238   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3286

>>253145

 

>limit damage of fake Q

but that is an HYPOTHESIS, and a very disputed one… hanging on to benefit of the doubt, even from his point of view, i can't really see the logic.

 

limit damage? Anons are wanting to understand what's going on, and told the answer without truly seeing for themselves, having to rely on archives and captures (but validity of those are easily put in question).

 

i am sorry to keep going, i admit it's not digging, and as long as drops were drops, this would have no place here, but currently we can't trust the floor under us, and that is a problem… i also still see this here as main point of focus, being last valid Q locale, and am staying here for now, but feel i have to warn fellow anons who are right in saying we should valiantly go on, but be aware that all is not as it seems.

 

ya, ok, maaaybe version of compromised Q turns out to be true, but from where i was these last few days, not a single trip Q was fake. Re-read the battle in 299/300 if you can find a complete version somewhere.

 

To me, those posts were Q, and quite clearly so. Oddly enough, big wave of anons saying "nah, not his style"… happened before, but now we're right in a crisis.

 

But most of all those posts were talking about this very platform, the very person posting as BO. Who chooses to delete, to… "limit damage".

Anonymous ID: 16fb00 Jan. 5, 2018, 6:44 p.m. No.253274   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>253191

same here, i feel like i'm wasting posts/thread place posting over and over but it seems nobody gets it - i guess that is what a successful clown campaign looks like.

 

They did get a lot better, this whole thing has been an amazing play, and took their time with it too, not like previous obvious waves.

 

please enjoy before we are deleted

 

all i wanted to say was yes i am also here also a human also not a clown

 

rip admiral ackbar