>>253692
My sense is that Zach, like Alex, are both being used (unknowingly?) to spread disinformation, which is not necessarily bad if it is from the white hats. But, on the face of it, their egos are too easily excited to be trusted not to impulsively disclose highly sensitive strategic information. For example, in previous Zach disclosures there was a clearly stated purpose, which was even morally heroic and appealing to this audence. He was warning the public about potential future false flag attacks over certain time frames in hopes that such public disclosure would discourage their execution. Considering that neither of his two previous predictions occurred, then it is possible to view these disclosures as successful. However, this time his intentions for calling into the show are not at all clear. He just seems to be boolstering Roger Stone's rumors about Bannon and Guo as turned agents of the deep state. He tells us he is back in Florida heading East enroute to Cape Canaveral for the impending launch of the Space X rocket, which according to him contains special USAF technology which will allow us to disarm NK without minimal loss of life (without saying it bluntly implying EMP weaponary). If true, then he has essentially compromised the mission. This would seem highly unprofessional to me because the risks by far outweight any benefit that could come from public disclosure. He is also too eager to build up Alex's bruised ego (resulting from Q envy) by telling him the Elon Musk is a big fan of the AJ Show. But overall, he seemed only to be providing new bread crumbs in an effort to connect Bannon, Guo, Soros, and NK to deep state objectives. Also, for the first time, he seemed to be suggesting that he has close ties to Q anon, by even parroting phrases alledgely posted today by Q anon, such as "what makes a GOOD movie, actors, etc."