Anonymous ID: 0ce06b Jan. 6, 2018, 12:43 a.m. No.255120   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5131 >>5133 >>5206

>>255112

Oh loads of us contribute and all genuine contributions are noted and appreciated…

 

Just slowly think of your idea of hosting q drops on an NSA server again, and then expand your consciousness and then tell me you genuinely think it's a good idea..

Anonymous ID: 0ce06b Jan. 6, 2018, 12:53 a.m. No.255143   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5158

>>255133

I wouldn't suggest anywhere. I would leave it to Q.. and "STUPID" was no ad hominem… it was an observation of you being STUPID enough to try and take the LEAD from Q

Anonymous ID: 0ce06b Jan. 6, 2018, 1:02 a.m. No.255159   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5180

>>255152

 

but.. but.. PGP!

 

>Thanks to its easily detectable OpenPGP Message Format it is an easy exercise for any manufacturer of Deep Packet Inspection hardware to offer a detection capability for PGP-encrypted messages anywhere in the flow of Internet communications, not only within SMTP. So by using PGP you are making yourself visible. Stf has been suggesting to use a non-detectable wrapping format