As for Q's second trip being comped, there's two reasons I believe that, based on the screencaps.

First: The first supposed non-Q trip usage was directly calling for the only thing that could help identify Q, that is - the IP he was posting from, to be released publically. "If BO doesn't provide, he is comped".

Second: The grammar and structure of posts doesn't match legit Q.

To me it means that yes, the second trip was comped and Q will need to either get a new one and verify it outside of board procedures (posting on /pol/ with second trip to verify a new one is out of the picture since it's been comped), or something else would need to happen, possibly with help of Codemonkey as the site admin.

Stay vigilant, anons. Someone just tried to comp Q communications.

>>255201

That's the problem right now: If disputed Q is the legit Q, then either BO's trip got comped, or the BO himself was comped. If he is not, Q's trip was compromised. This is a stalemate kind of situation, with just one out that was left by disputed Q - no more posts under his trip on this board. Monday will be the first significant date where questions will be asked, Q wouldn't, I think, leave the show unfolding without a heads-up for anons beforehand.

It's best to wait for further movements right now, modanons don't have a way to look into IPs/Identities AFAIU, so it's a waiting game right now. For now, focusing on last crumbs would be the best idea, I think.

Wish I could do more than just lurk.

>>255213

Hey, BO. There's a lot of doubt in the air, sorry for being a prissy bitch about it, but is info forthcoming in an announcement? This shit is not a game and chain of trust has been broken either on your, or on Q's trip side. I saw disputed Q making a test post from a different device which might be suggesting he returned to an old one to confirm his ip, however, the speed with which he denounced the board wasn't, I feel, too (((kosher))).

>>255219

>>255223

Hah, no way, too many discrepancies in the way he posted, right now leaning to trip being compromised, just wish for more info to decide myself. Fuckery abounds, but still trusting.

>>255233

The three posts about Loop were confirmed by Codemonkey, they were legit.

>>255238

Dammit, yes, you're right, sorry, brain's too tired.

Proof was in the pudding IMO, connections dug lead to Hussein.

>>255259

lurker. See >>255241

>>255303

Thank you. All I needed, going back to lurk mode.

>>255344

Not Q. Researched threads back after looking through recent buttfrustrations, am now convinced BO is telling the truth.

>>255349

Carry on BO. Salutations from Poland (just to confirm it's still me), za wolność naszą i waszą.

>>255366

tl;dr notQ dropped interesting research that was floated around /thestorm/ before, thought it was a situation of "broken clock being right twice a day", but apparently some faggot with Q's comped trip took that and ran with it here to fuck with the board. Things to look out for:

• Stringers not exactly matching format Q has been using.

• Changed grammar and sentence structure. Will not point exactly as to not improve shills.

• Fact that 4fags have been cracking Q's second trip, just like they were for the first one.

Timing is way too fucking convenient for it not to be a shill attack and almost successfully dismantled anon participation. I salute those who didn't get rused at once, I was on the verge.

>>255382

Are we discussing if recent Q is real Q, or the BO acting like he was?

>>255384

If you weren't aware, we weren't using 100% confirmable facts since the start, what with plausible deniability etc.

>>255393

How could you confirm Q's first trip was cracked before the faggot that did it released the password?

>>255392

never was. I told you I'm a lurker who came over from 4chin.

>>255394

shifting the goalposts, then. Ok.

>>255401

so your beef is with the BO, not whether or not recent Q was real Q. That speaks to me "I'm not here for the mission, I'm here to shitstir". If that was your intended message, congratulations.

>>255402

And the recent ones were. Does that make them real?

>>255405

wow, I'm new on fullchan and even I know /pol/ is using that phrase in the regular. Way to out yourself with simple DARVO, fag.

>>255409

>>255411

You people seem to forget the most fucking basic rule of any imageboards ever:

MODS=FAGS.

Always have been. Always will be. The only thing they are here for is getting the board to run smoothly and since this is a special-purpose board WITH A SPECIFIC MISSION - their actions are in support of that mission, so either get your butthurt back to /thestorm/, or dealwithit.

>>255413

Well now, since we're shitposting and was pulled out of lurking, any… proofs?

>>255415

really now! Could you perhaps tell me what brb soup was all about?

>>255420

I don't know. Perhaps you could ask the BO himself? How does that relate to the current discussion? As mentioned, we were supposedly discussing whether recent Q was real Q, not what the BO was doing. Who is actually deflecting the most important fucking matter to whether BO is a faggot or not?

>>255428

As I said, too many convenient (((coincidences))) here >>255375. This isn't proof, because it's impossible to get proof until someone releases the password as with the first comped Q trip. Yet, back when first Q's trip was getting cracked, BO reacted and Q acted accordingly - by changing trip. Recently Q came back and was confirmed both by BO and Codemonkey. Recent drops haven't been by either of them, while BO was taking drastic measures - deleting posts - to stop shill chatter that was getting 100% crazy the last three threads I've checked and stopping real digs that lead anywhere. It's still going pretty crazy.

The last, 100% last way for Q to confirm those deleted posts were his is to never return to /cbts/ and for that we would have to wait and see. If he does not return within a month, I'll gladly eat shit, but for now, everything I see, ESPECIALLY repeated posts like >>255433

>>255435 , screams to me "shill invasion".