and their post numbers are … ?
> Shall we rename this one #303?
i'd say let it be.
This little hiccup is a battle scar. We shall wear it with pride. We were resilient and we are still here fighting the good fight.
Thank you for everything you do, Modanon.
maybe Q can make a website, put crumbs on it, host the website on verified NSA servers, and we can visit that website for fresh crumbs.
Maybe Q should take matters completely in his hands.
the fact that i never called you a shill, but you still used that word in your post makes you one.
> it just makes you STUPID
at least i try to contribute to CBTS. And so far anons have been very welcoming of my work.
>hosting q drops on an NSA server
if you are suggesting that NSA servers might be comped, well, have i got news for your 8ch servers.
Any server can be comped.
But for NSA [or US military even] I will say that as of now no other servers are as trusted.
You may disagree, sure, but i request you to at least stop name-calling, it weakens the merit of the logic in your point.
Finally, if you really care about CBTS, where else would you suggest hosting the biggest drop of modern times?
Thank you, anons.
appreciate it.
>try and take the LEAD from Q
>I would leave it to Q
when I said, "Maybe Q should…" that meant leaving it to Q to do as he deems best.
"NSA servers" was s suggestion, not an order,
Finally, i agree that Q should decide what to do now.
>DENIABLE
yeah, i agree.
Deniability is a prerequisite for Q.
I take back my "NSA server" suggestion.