Anonymous ID: e5d29a Jan. 6, 2018, 12:31 a.m. No.255077   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5088 >>5135

>>254960

Yet, Q "secured" his IP on the 4th, when he WAS verified by CM:

 

462

Jan 4 2018, 00:58:17

Anonymous

ID: 8f9964

239015

https://8ch.net/pol/res/11113218.html#11115887

Lock routed CA IP and tag.

Secured and fixed.

Previous pw was let go.

Safeguards in place.

Q

Anonymous ID: e5d29a Jan. 6, 2018, 12:55 a.m. No.255147   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5163

>>255135

My point was that if his IP address was secured, the BO would KNOW what they were. Have no idea if BO has been comped or not - just saying that all the arguments I've seen, have not taken into account that Q SECURED his IP, so BO should KNOW what it was. And Q would know this.

Anonymous ID: e5d29a Jan. 6, 2018, 1:12 a.m. No.255183   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5197

>>255172

BO had done away with trips, because the 1st had been cracked, and the 2nd was close to being cracked (explanation is in bread at top). So they closed the trips. Then they opened them ALL up after CM made a MORE secure trip code. Then they waited on Q. Q verified his ID on 4th, but never got the MORE secure tripcode.