>>255541

A. We don’t know for sure his second trip was cracked because there is not one shred of evidence.

B. You claim you have a way to contact Q but you can’t provide evidence.

C. You can’t force Q to play by your rules. I don’t think his second trip was cracked. If it wasn’t, you just messed up everything. What if that last post WAS Q?? Now what!!

Prove me wrong BO.

>>255727

What? No, perhaps not everybody is stupid enough to fall for the BO following he managed to accumulate in such a short amount of time

WAKE UP dipshit

>>255721

I agree with you!!

This is wrong. Very very wrong.

>>255743

They straight up said Q was a larp last night

We are not on track and Q isnt gunna play by BO rules

>>255745

Right. No proofs? Don’t need proofs?

Think. Think about what you are saying. I think last night Q was legit. I want to know why BO says it wasn’t.

>>255750

I’m talking about BO

You guys are on some next level defend the BO and not Q shit

Q, if you’re reading this and I’m wrong, I’m sorry.

If you’re reading this and I’m right, I tried. I really did.