Anonymous ID: 8149a2 Jan. 6, 2018, 5:32 a.m. No.255717   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>255691

lol why the fuck would we trust Corsi

 

Did you see how he tried to create an official looking document out of a Q post, mark it up with the meanings broken down, then signed his name on it like it was his baby?

Only problem was this was days after we had already solved it. He's just a famefag of the highest degree, and so of course BO would think that dropping his name would mean something. Only to other famefags, I'm afraid.

Anonymous ID: 8149a2 Jan. 6, 2018, 6:10 a.m. No.255806   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5822 >>5841

>>255790

 

I'll be honest, I've been openly critical of you, because it really rubs me the wrong way when questions and healthy skepticism is shut down and appeals to authority are made in their place.

 

You seem reasonable enough….is there anything you can do, that will maintain appropriate op sec, but will provide some sort of validation for those with honest concerns?

Something you can do for Q to validate the new arrangement moving forward, so we can put it all behind us?

 

Trust me I'd love nothing more than to have something firm I can use to defend you and this board moving forward. I am an annoying fucker when I have a good fact to use, and I will shill hard for the truth. But I am also a skeptical fucker, and I'm afraid no matter how cool of a dude you may be, I'm not going to blindly trust and follow you.