>>258100

That wasn't Q - Pamphlet and I definitely got played there.

But there's a whole lot of things that are not right. Why would Q deliberately comp this board, force a move to /thestorm/ and then comp that and go to /greatawakening/ all in the space of three days? Why strongly hint that the message needs to go wider and then complain that we're talking to YouTubers? Why is /qresearch/ completely fucking useless? Why didn't Q get a super secure trip? Why did CM change the trip generation out from under my feet at exactly the same time as someone who sounded NOTHING like Q was posting? How can CM even be trusted?

>>258110

Has he predicted the future at all in the same way as old Q did?

>>258108

That's just retarded. Some anons HAVE to use TOR.

>>258114

Yes it could. Need a lot more info about it though - sample rate, format, unsigned vs signed, source, etc

Let's take a look at a post made on 1/1 - pic related. It was very quickly deleted. We also have a screenshot of the CBTS Bakery mods discussing this post as well - in private chat. The post is fake for a number of reasons:

• It doesn't have a space between the Q and the trip

• It makes ridiculous claims like 'the operation has been compromised from the start' and 'Presidency has been compromised.'

• It was deleted.

• It uses the old tripcode despite the fact that Q could have used either old or new according to the whitelist at the time.

• It was made soon after an anon on 4/pol announced he was getting close to cracking that password - which as we know is 'Matlock.'

It is very suspicious that the only screenshot of this post just happened to be made by a baker working with someone who has used the phrase 'compromised from the start' several times in conversation with me, despite being complete nonsense. Q has posted on this board hundreds of times and given all sorts of confirmation, including having a dig at Lynn de Rothschild browsing #57 BEFORE she started her drunken rant.

So yeah, this is a fake post by Breadb0x.

>>258120

I don't trust CM either.

>>258128

>If you start at the premise that the whole thing is a larp and work your way forward some of the rationalizations are a lot easier to accept than the "deep throat" theory.

>flip the confirmation bias by 180 and then try and rationalize how this could be a larp, it's easier than you think.

Not even nearly.

• The Lord's Prayer - catholic version.

• Bangladeshi bomber

• Unique AF1 pics.

• NK pics taken from AF1

• SA upheaval

• Bidirectional comms with POTUS Twitter - 'a special place' et al.

• Plus plus

• POTUS c&p of anon's McCabe comments

• Pic of POTUS fountain pen taken at Camp David

• Inside knowledge of Vegas incident

• POTUS shoutouts

• Rothschild estate incident

• Boots and monitors on a bunch of elites

• CEOs resigning like crazy

• Knowing LdR is about to post

You can nitpick these individually (a very few) but you can't explain them all in one shot.

>>258132

No moron, you said flip the confirmation bias and then try to rationalize how this could be a larp, it's easier than you think. It's impossible to do that.

Jan 5th Q is a LARP

The IP logs of Q's posts from this IP from Jan 5 to Jan 6 are attached. This is them in their entirety. So when I question the authenticity of this poster (third one down) and 'Q' replies 'False. Did they get to you? Board is compromised', he's lying. These are the ONLY IPs in the mod log for this poster so by definition he's lying. Q doesn't talk like this. Illiterate teen fags talk like this.

Q's trip was very close to being cracked by the 1st Jan - other pic related. Coincidentally, when I jumped onto a Discord server shared with Breadfag later that evening, he said "Best. Day. Ever."

>>258225

>Where are the IP logs though? I just see one IP hash(??) on the first image and nothing else. Sorry if stupid question.

That's all you get to see as a mod. This is a page of all posts made by the hash of the IP used to post with

>TL;DR - Vocabulary in teenager-tier. Lack of military vocabulary usage on simple things (would say secure not safe/auth.) Q did three drops then spent 5 posts trying to establish credibility(out of character). Read the drops, in your gut they feel like bullshit.

Agreed.

>BO may be comped, or wanted to make money, whatever.

No I am not and have never wanted to make money. Where did that idea come from? You guessed it.

>>258233

Checked and ayed. Completely filled up with bullshit.

>>258241

I doubt that real Q is going to post here again. For a start, Codemonkey is either fucking stupid or completely compromised. That's a problem for this board - and others.

>>258243

Yes - TOR is blocked by /qresearch/. Not gonna happen here.

>>258247

It's staying open. I'm also doing a website for searching Q posts as an alternative to the github one which has poor filtering and doesn't work on mobiles.

>>258157

The problem is you're a shill.

>>258223

>Why would Q not have periodically changed their trip and confirmed the new with the old on a regular basis? Heck, I change my IP every 1 to 2 days, and certain PWs weekly.

Continuity.

>Why has neither the old Q nor the new Q utilized the supertrip feature?

That is a very good question to which I have yet to receive a satisfactory answer.

>>258271

He adjusted the code that generates the super secure tripcode so that it would include capital letters in the output. He did this without telling anyone outside of /sudo/ the stupid twat. So I posted an announcement that I was very suspicious of Jan 5 Q and ended up not being believed by most of the anons because my trip suddenly changed.

I don't think CM is compromised, just lazy and useless.

>>258299

What conclusions do you draw?

Hint: what race could the BO of /qresearch/ possibly be?