>>261069

>There are deep connections to Common Core, the Clinton Foundation and DARPA

Agreed. Although I missed the news on DARPA connection at the time. I wonder how deep those actually went beyond just funding DiGRA? But I'm glad it's not just me, this feels like a very similar operation. Not sure what the goal is though.

>the entire Q operation was done entirely by the book

Agreed. Although it does make me curious about the larpers playing the role. If they're not in on it, I wouldn't be surprised if they got a visit from some important people, even if other factions shut down the Q-intel project it seems weird they'd just leave people larping on something that appears to still be the account without oversight. Not impossible, but notably strange.

>President would have declassified everything

I'm also really hoping this is true. He seems genuinely keen on clearing the air, and doesn't seem overly fond of secrecy and cloak and daggers shit. Ought to mean a reasonable amount of info finds its way out, which is good.

>this looks like them being taken down.

I agree. The denver airport connection is a good one, although I think that one was probably taken over some time ago. It really was a huge operation, hard to know exactly how big. Most of the reports i've come across suggest 5-7 storeys below ground, with potentially more unknown. I suspect this might have been some kind of parallel sub-station/holding site, something like that? But yeah it's weird as hell. The original thread felt genuinely strange, hence why it got so much attention. That it's been completely deleted makes me MUCH more suspicious. I checked quite thoroughly, it's gone. I did find these related threads though if you're interested, there's probably various bits of info scattered about in them. Sorry I can't help more with finding precise pieces, I've got my dissertation going on atm, takes up a depressing amount of my time.

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167133295/massive-fire-seen-on-billionaire-and-sexual

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167156534/epsteins-lolita-island-has-been-btfo

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167090710/epstein-island-is-destroyed

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167014075/epstein-island-is-kill

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167020731/epstein-island-is-toast

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167012706/epstein-island-moabed

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167043314/slide-threads-a-plenty-what-are-they-hiding

>http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167135115/the-pizza-pedos-are-worse-then-you-could-imagine

> he changed the bloody algorithm

Did that mean all trips changed, or just !!! ones? But yes I agree it's very suspicious timing. And if you change the algorithm and there's a chance you've been completely compromised by deepstate people then the algorithm itself is pretty suspect. I'm not certain but I imagine you could manipulate the algorithm to include backdoors etc if you really wanted to. Would definitely mean it wasn't safe for Q to continue posting if there was a chance they could just backdoor his trips and not have to worry about wasting time hacking. I think you're right r.e the IP too, although i do concede it's not impossible codemonkey did have other ways of achieving verification - something on the deepweb might represent a (moderately) secure solution, although that's still compromised too. I also suspect if the people who were attempting to hack Q's trips were so desperate to do so, they could have moved on to other methods to suppress his voice if he suddenly got a new more secure trip. DDOS, admin/mod supression, that kind of shit. I can't think of any notable evidence they're suppressing him. I wonder if maybe the gun to CMs head doesn't belong to a clown, but to a pro-Trump faction?

>20% public for justice, 80% secret to spare us

Sounds like a good guess. In the long run that may even have been what Q was for - an attempt to confirm some of the more gruesome rumours that would end up getting covered up. The irony of the situation will probably be these people will be up on charges like mass rape etc, pedophilia, maybe some murder charges and people are going to believe it's some kind of insane theatrical kangaroo court charge sheet. And yet it'll be painting them like fucking saints in comparison to reality. I suspect there might be enough vendettas being formed in this process that some of the very gory details might be confirmed though, and I would be interested to see some of the broader strokes details, it's not often literal satanic cults are going to be exposed to the world. Pic related (tree part) is one such example Id be interested to see a confirmation of.

>>261069

>I've already got a publisher and a great deal of interest.

Good job!. That sounds like a really fun book to write. Probably going to be an awful lot of digging and research though, especially if many of the details don't get declassified for a while. But honestly I'm glad, this is the kind of insanely complex case that really merits being laid out in long text format. And as you say it should piss a hilarious amount of people off, including the larpers. I wonder if the nu-Q larpers will do their own book? (inb4 they name it I,Q).

>>261070

>Roths have been in custody since Jan 1

That's promising. I do agree they, along with a suspicious number of important people haven't been seen a whole hell of a lot in public recently. And I'm very glad to hear about the shipping containers being seized. I wonder if trump is going to see-saw these trials into just straight up taking over large portions of their enterprises? You could easily avoid the whole classic "people won't invest due to fear of lack of rule of law" by just making the seizures part of the rule of law. And the Rotschilds sure do have a lot of things to seize.

> The order is SA->US->EU->Asia

Sounds plausible, and I agree it will likely be focused to the US + maybe SA/Israel for now. Does concern me a little though, if the situation in America goes hot with the trials etc, I have no idea what things will look like here where they're still in control. Hopefully nothing too dramatic, but as I said I anticipate major "domestic" false flags in the future to be European, because they'll lack the resources in the US. Trump should probably literally just invade any holdout Euro countries, at this point he'd have a large amount of popular support.

>The master plan for the UK is for it to become an Islamic caliphate, followed by Europe

Also agreed, 100%. Totally unrelated news article

>https://observer.news/world/study-reveals-queen-elizabeth-ii-descendant-prophet-muhammad/

Yeah they've been gunning hard for Islam in Europe for a while. With SA help, although that largely seems to be drying up in the near future thank fuck. God knows why we let some one of the most violently unhelpful for society sects fund extremist mosques fucking everywhere. I'm curious to know how things will turn out long term though. In some places especially Germany I think they're going to end up deporting a lot of people. 500,000+. Probably other countries too. Britain has a harder situation (muslims are much older, 2nd+gen), but I wouldn't be surprised to see a similar situation. Pakistani's in particular will likely either be deported or flee. When all this Q stuff breaks I suspect riots here will be as much anti-paki as they will anti-government/pedo.

>elites are all Luciferians who traffick kids

Ah yes. Yeah I honestly wonder if they're going to bring in the luciferianism or not. It might make it seem too implausiable for people, or too easy to connect the dots to stuff they'd rather keep hidden? But the human trafficking amongst others is going to be a stunning revelation. I can't really gauge how serious the level of societal anger is going to be, but I think it'll involve corpses. It's a question only of how many rather than if.

>Iranian people are about to overthrow their rulers

My problem with this theory isn't so much the public angst in Iran - I believe that exists. But I think the level of anger between Shia and Sunni muslims will probably overshadow these concerns. For all there might be a popular revolt against the hardcore islamists, I believe they'll stay Sunni, and therefore stay borderline foes with Shia's. Even if they revolt, I don't think it would be into something the US/SA find acceptable. I don't think they want to surrender power in the region to the Saudi's (as a people, not as a government), and I think Russia will be quite willing to ensure they can establish a regime of the Iranian peoples choice. Trump wants a non-nuclear Iran, but Iran doesn't. Russia probably isn't keen on it either. Maybe, just maybe if the sampson option has been dismantled Russia might have made under the table deals to force Iranians to disarm. But I'm still suspicious. I think NATO, Israel, and Trump are all overconfident about US power to force a solution they like, and it's utterly continent on Russia and China just agreeing to it. If they have, what did they gain from that decision?

>>261072

>wasn't the nations per se but the individuals within who were at fault

I'll grant you that, but especially in Israels case that literally does not matter. Aside from the disgusting level of spying, murder of "allies", planning literal terrorist attacks etc, they (the Jews), are largely responsible for the white demographic genocide, and god knows what else. I do sincerely believe #notalljews etc, but it's irrelevant for Israel. They've done too much, and heaped on the verbal abuse too much. Comeys "lament for Israel" tweets will be prophetic.I'm not sure I see any kind of future for it as a country. If they've removed nukes, they're going to be invaded by every Islamic nation surrounding them (maybe excluding SA), and large portions of the world will be cheering them on. Hence why I find the removal of the sampson option suspicious, although also interesting. Even if true, it implies I've either missed something huge, or everyone is putting a stunning amount of faith in everyone instantly forgiving Israel.

>I am worried about Syria though

Agreed. The major gas attack last night was another obvious false flag, luckily trump again didn't bite. So I'm pretty confident he's not going to engage by this point. I don't know what he's there for, but it's not Syria. I don't think he gives a single shit about the country (side note, between the US and the Russian forces I'll give you a guess which small, annoying, and steadily growing nation state is completely surrounded).

>>261071

Found some more related threads, including this one (http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167086590/weird-leaf-posting-last-night) which is about the specific thread I was talking about. Remainder are just related to the other links. Something seriously weird is happening with Earthquakes right now. Maybe they're the "car crash" or "helicopter training accident" of the deep underground bunker world.

>>261074

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/167118789/tthis-is-what-earthquake-seismographs-look-like

http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/166946359/please-believe-me-the-la-earthquake-was-a-result

>>261078

>I can't find the long explanation

It's ok, I've seen some summaries, and any DARPA links would be predominantly hidden.

>I doxed two of the individuals

Also noted, good job. Decent restraint too. But yes I suspect they'll get shut down sometime before it all goes public.

>The judgment on these demons for their crimes will be the harshest possible I think.

I hope so. I'm relatively confident of punishment post mortem, I just sincerely hope we hurry their lives towards that fairly predictable judgement. Preferably painfully, and publicly.

>It's a dilemma

Agreed. It's hard to know how generous the publishers would be with content like that, and it may run a risk of legal liability for some claims. I think most books on the subject are probably going to have to pick a firm line on "esoteric knowledge", and then stick to it firmly. Depending how much information on their crimes goes public, that will basically determine what you can include, and what becomes "conspiracy theories". You're probably going to have to write a large chunk of the body then edit the rest depending on the outcome of nurenburg2.

> assets can be seized lock stock and barrel.

Fucking beautiful. And yes as you say it is literally trillions worth. Interesting way to get corporation capital back inside the country too. It's definitely going to be a huge bonanza

>Can you imagine the insane levels of butthurt stretching decades into the future as trump is revered as one of the greatest presidents of all time? It's going to be beautiful.

>>261082

>9/11 is an open wound in America

Pretty much this. I don't think I really appreciate how much, in part because I'm not American, and partly because I was a little too young when it happened. But I think when it turns out someone other than claimed was behind it, that place is probably going to get DEMOCRATISED by the US military next. And as you say, they've also been heavily infiltrating the US government (british one too I assume, I even believe the theory about them breeding into the royal family through bastard kids). I think the bigger problem though might be not just which side will the Jews support, but will people even let them claim to support that nationalities side? I suspect in theory the overall mass of public opinion would probably say yes, but if say 1/3rd+ of the population literally hates you, I don't see any situation that doesn't involve either mass deportations or mass executions. It's not about whether they say they'll work with us, it's whether we'll believe them when they make that promise for the 89th time.

> I think the UK is already lost to Islam quite honestly and so is most of Europe.

I'd be more worried about America, although I agree the situation is a bit rough. Britian is ~ 4.5% muslim. Demographic changes will increase that a little but not much. They're also massively clustered in cities. We still form the majority by an insane portion. If it comes to a civil war, they're outnumbered 20:1. There are some countries that might face serious trouble (attempted caliphate style), most obviously Sweden, germany, and france in decreasing order of likelihood. But even then they may even be making positive changes. If Sweden's elections don't go well they might be doomed. But I think Germany is psyching up to deport upwards of half a million people. Things could go badly for them, but it would need to continue uninterrupted for a decade or so longer. In the US on the other hand, whites are already close to a minority. As much as these trials will be the death of the DNC, there will instantly be another liberal party waiting to fill its place. And you have a huge (~44%) block of the population who will willingly vote for them every time and breed faster. America could also do the deportation / lynchmob thing, but it would be an order of magnitude larger than what would have to happen in any European country.

I do think false flags are likely though - my money would be on tower bridge, or some other kind of Van of Diversity style event. Big ben is probably deemed too historical, my guess is the backlash to that being false flagged would be too large. I think they'd go for some kind of staged attack, either weapons or vehicular. Harder for intelligence services to track than explosives if nothing else.

>Which is why I think brutal public executions will be necessary.

I am beyond hyped for those ultra comfy threads where gifted anons can photoshop hilary clitons swinging corpse into a variety of amusing situations. But yeah I agree I think some kind of public, or at least (more likely imho) televised executions for major players seems highly probable.

>make it into a modern secular state

This theory isn't impossible, but I think we definitely have a different read on the religious angle there at the moment. I know SA is bored to shit with their religious leaders and is rapidly culling them, and I also know Iran is unimpressed with being Taliban v.0.1 in terms of Islamic repression, but I'm not sure I see them becoming secular. I think religion will be somewhat resurgent in the next few decades, and I think that will drive the old Sunni/Shia divide. Iran might be able to be persuaded to delay nukes, but they'd end up getting them in a SA based arms race eventually, and the population if it feels threatened by an enforced SA/NATO/Israel regime change may well want to keep nukes, even with a more secular regime. As I said, demographics in the US mean Trump was probably something of a last gasp for the GOP - the electoral college will only protect vs larger numbers for so long. And long term I'm not sure how plausible I can find Sunnis, Shias and Jews holding hands as they plan a glorious peaceful middle east. I think the first two gang up and kill the second and then fight to the death, same as they have done for centuries.

>>261085

>NATO's opinion will no longer matter once the tribunals begin I think.

This is probably true. I'm really hoping once the trial hits its such serious shit the US uses it as an excuse to unilaterally withdraw from Syria. But again, real life keeps getting in the way of this hypothesis. Trump is making some convincing sounding angry noises about the (((evil gas attack))), and seems ready and willing to launch missiles. It could be a ploy, but I suspect he'll do some kind of "shock and awe" bombing same as last time. I'd feel a lot more comfortable believing WW3 wasn't about to start in the middle east if trump didn't do such a good job appearing to play along with his (((assigned role))). For all I don't doubt with HRC we'd already be at war with Russia, this timeline doesn't seem like it's far off that point.

>>261087

Yeah those are the tweets that have got me rattled. I'm expecting the response to occur sometime while I'm asleep tbh. between about 3 and 6am GMT, based on when they've done these kind of strikes before.

I think you've slightly misread his tweet r.e Iran though. imho he's stating Iran is partially responsible for backing Assad, not for the attack itself. Indirect vs direct blame. I don't think he's trying to insinuate they played a direct role in this chemical attack.

I also heavily disagree r.e the potential conclusions too - pic from an earlier incident but related and amusing. I see no logical reason for Assad to gas his own people. He is essentially winning the fight (by a large margin), and has incredibly high morale in his armed forces, at least given the circumstances. He's doing fine with conventional weapons, and he has backing from Russia and Iran, with only limited NATO interference now they're playing a more active role. Trump says he's going to leave Syria and then wham chemical false flag. As you say it's not a coincidence, but Assad has no logical reason to do it. False flag implies someones trying to gain something. What exactly does Assad gain out of provoking NATO into invading him? Genuinely asking, because that's the only thing you're going to achieve by using chemical weapons. If you could win without them, why use them? On the other hand, it makes all the sense in the world for Israel/Mossad to want a false flag operation to occur, so they can trigger a "liberation" of the Syrian people through NATO, and remove yet another one of Irans power pieces in the region. Hence why the Israelies and their DC pawns are some of the loudest voices calling for immediate military response. This false flag is textbook, presumably carried out by either Mossad or a US deepstate faction. They're the only ones who want NATO to invade and start WW3 right now. Russia and Iran would love it if NATO fucked off, it's the NATO side that's chomping for the bit. The only faction that I can think of that might be incentivised to push for war that I haven't mentioned is Turkey. They want more of the Kurdish land, and they'd probably be willing to take it in a sloppy war, trusting the US would ultimately not openly challenge them on it. But I don't think they did it, I'm not convinced they have the resources in the region. My money is on this being exactly what the Russians say it is - a long planned, false-flag chemical attack to provoke an american military response, probably using chemical weapons smuggled in in aid convoys (seen twitter photos suggesting the chlorine may have been german manunfactured, although I'm afraid that was some hours ago and I don't have the link). I could definitely be wrong, and I'd sincerely love to hear any suggestions on logical reasons why Assad would want to use chemical weapons over conventional warfare in his current position, but I'm not seeing them.

>>261087

Potentially relevant tweet. Not sure if I believe it but it sounds plausible, and he must have people who write many of his tweets. Interesting to note his language in the final tweet too. SICK!. Similar to the recent Q ones, although I don't know how the timeframes relate and I'm off to bed now anyway.

Based on Russia and the US having separately called for security council meetings, scheduled for tomorrow morning, I'm tempted to say nothing will happen tonight. Nothing major anyway, maybe a repeat of the "bomb some nowhersevilee airfield". Probably not even that though. My personal guess is the pair of potus tweets were pretending to play along, or just not written by him and he's happy to let the media bitch about what he tweets as usual. I could be wrong, but that makes sense. On the other hand, they could also just have flipped him. It was always a possibility eventually. Everyone has weak spots.