>>261030

>Current Q is a LARP who has got the odd bit of real intel from somewhere.

This is the theory I favour as well. However, we don't know enough to know who of from where etc. The tip-top prediction was interesting because it suggests a serious degree of closeness to trump. If we assume for the moment trump is still roughly /ourguy/, the closeness and influence the tip-top prediction implies does make me wonder if larp-q is explicity pro clowns.

If he's getting his intel, who is he getting it from? Is he just your standard larper who knows most of the redpills and can reformat + dig for some genuine truth, or is he being fed it by a "faction"? And if it's a faction, is it pro or anti clowns?

I don't think we have enough information to be certain larp-q is pro clowns, although I do agree he's acting weird as fuck. One possibility that occured - if you hand the Q account trips etc over to "larpers" who then fuck about with it, you could essentially use that as crude stenography. I agree (((they're))) still probably watching it closely, but it might still be serving some purpose we don't understand.

It's also not impossible it's just a total larp since ~5th Jan, but the intel he clearly still has makes it interesting.

>>261053

>It didn't happen in SOTU.

I do agree there are some oddities, including it being pointed out by an anon. But you kind of answered why it might have appeared where it did, and even why it might not have been acknowledged here

>And he would not leave it to some anon to choose what the President needed to say

It was requested for SOTU, but that's actually relatively important, they're not just going to let anons choose what he says for it. But some random easter thing? That's more manageable. And by not acknowledging it he avoids easy media hate by taking requests from the "neo-nazi" basket weaving forums. I agree there's some oddities, but they exist for both theories. I just don't think it's impossible we're missing something.

>The information density in larp-q's posts is so poor

Very valid point. He seems to be mostly talking crap these days, and very little of what he says ends up bearing reference to reality. I've read your entire thread on the evidence you've collected and I agree it's seriously convincing - something fishy as fuck happened around the turn of the new year. I'm just less certain as to what happened. Q getting tripcode jacked is possible, but if you go through the trouble of bringing stuff like this to peoples attention, why would you suddenly go totally dark, especially if some wankers start playing w/ your trip. To my mind there are three logical theories

>He was essentially what he claimed, but he's been compromised

>He's gone dark for some unknown reason and things are proceeding normally(/ish), and he feels no need to correct the record.

> Itwas a larp from the start. I realise there's been way too much good information for this to make much sense. The only thing I can possibly thing of that might explain it being a larp from the start would be if some very high ranking cabal people had authorised it. I'm not sure exactly why, but as you say the new boards are clown honeypots, so it may have served as a way to identify possible troublemakers? Possibly flush out boomer lurkers given the age profiles of q followers.

>There was no handover - someone cracked the trip pw with serious hardware

Is there any certain proof for this particular piece? I'm not trying to not go looking for evidence here, I've read your entire fake-Q thread, I just can't remember any specific evidence proving it was hacked beyond perhaps some Q posts in nov/dec 17 talking about people attempting to break the codes? If there's no hard evidence that could have been a ploy. Again unlikely i agree, but I'm trying to differentiate between certainties and probabilities.

>Original Q may have been removed from the executive office of the presidency when Adm Rogers retired.

I think something like this is a good guess, although I'm interested to know what it means in the long run. In some circumstances it's a shame we don't get more news, in others we're probably pretty fucked. It would be useful to try to narrow down which of the two it is .

>>261057

>Q was an adult

Good point and one of the best arguments against nuQ. Old Q had, for lack of a better word, dignity. Old style manners. I don't see as much evidence of anymore.

> His only concern was whether he could post or not

>Codemonkey was either a traitor or breathtakingly incompetent

This I also agree with. Although I'm not sure I believe incompetence on codemonkeys part. He seems competent enough that he could have done it if we wanted/was allowed to. I personally favour the idea of codemonkey having been compromised - it would fit with the traditional pattern of jacking mods across the chans these past few years. imho the various organisations have decided the best way to control the chans is to keep them alive but own the mods/admins.

>It's telling that the changes CM has made to the codebase in the last three months haven't been committed to the public repository on Github.

That's interesting too, I wasn't aware of that. I though 8ch was designed to be open source, or something similar? Definitely strong support for the (((honeypot))) idea.

The only problem I have with the above sections is why has Q not made new attempts to establish contact? I don't believe he needed the anons to "solve" puzzles - as you say he was interested in making sure we understood them, and extracted the information we needed to. We weren't (or were only very rarely) providing him with any new information. So why not attempt to reestablish contact? He's definitely wary of being compromised, and attempting to anonymously confirm yourself as Q could be difficult. But I'd have expected at least an attempt.

>The timing is about right.

I mostly agree with this - SHA1 based trips were definitely not secure against determined opponents. But I think the timescales might vary a fair bit between opponents in the modern age. Am I right in thinking that at least one of the people who got close to cracking trueQ's trip was some random /pol/ anon? As you say with better hardware you can drop the time quite considerably, and I suspect a national level organisation could probably reduce the time required by somewhere between 0.25-1 orders of magnitude by throwing supercomputers at it. If at least one of the attempts was by someone random, even determined, I'd guess a truly serious attack would crack it much, much faster. I think the scale of the DDOS attack that was launched vs wikileaks gives a decent idea how much computing power / resources these people have to throw at problems. But then I'm also not convinced this is a perfect answer either - if Q expected to be compromised, why didn't he set up and authenticate say 20 trip codes? Hell set up and verify 5 new ones each and every day, it would mean even if you did get compromised by an attack you could immediately post again from one of your more recent (and thus presumably secure) discardable trip identities. And I have to believe someone with Q's intel and sources would know just how easy to crack these trips were going to be. The only other potential solution is that he wasn't tech savvy, or lacked the OPSEC to set up running validated trips, in my mind. And neither of those make much sense either. It's very confusing - it feels like he should have seen this problem coming, and could have worked around it, and if he couldn't it makes me suspicious about just who Q is /are.

>>261057

>>261058

Comment was too long, continued. The pic related in this comment should be for the pic above too.

>Dem criminality will be dealt with before the midterms

This is your most crucial prediction. I agree with the entire para above it your predictions too - there's been a large anti cabal operation, and it seems to be going very well. Trump is probably on our side. Clowns are running scared etc. But until the moment the news spreads I'm still suspicious. The midterms is the real clue in my mind. He has to, simply HAS to reveal it before then - at least the broad strokes. He doesn't have mad high popularity ratings, dems are unimaginably bitter and planning HARD for a blue wave, so he simply has to reveal it before then. If he fails, he might really struggle to actually carry it out. And because of that I'd really still expect the hype to be building. Big public stuff like this against the cabal wouldn't have happened without hundreds of smaller, costly, and secret victories, which ought to mean that the closer it got to the end, the easier it was to start leaking large bits of the information out. If nothing is revealed by midterms, I think that's when everyone on the chans should start panicking, and at the very least step up their OPSEC significantly.

> Sessions and the IG will be dealing with the major scandals currently being investigated

Absolutely agree - I reckon this is a near certainty at this point. Some very big names are about to get charged.

> Iran will have a regime change.

>Peace is about to break out in the Middle East and it will be glorious.

This prediction I very much disagree with though. The situation in Syria is unpleasantly warm right now. Russian and US fleets are literally squaring off in the Med, and it really could turn into a hot war fast. A little while ago I think there were some serious incidents in Syrian airspace - pic related shows the USAF 11175 channel activity, the peaks on the right correspond very accurately with some airstrikes carried out in syria as part of operation inherent resolve.

I'd love to belive trump is planning some kind of master play, and he might well be. But from the sounds of what you wrote I think it will play out differently. Israel is about to be humiliated, and I can't see that making them overly peaceful. They, NATO, and SA are going to lose their objectives in Syria. Assad will remain, supported by Russia and Iran. And if that's the case, I'm not sure I see an imminent regime change for Iran. It might happen, but I see no way for the US to enforce it in any way shape or form. Doing so would literally start WW3, and kill us all. There might be peace in the middle east, and there might be regime change in Iran, but not like you suggested imho.

I find the middle eastern situation easily the most disturbing aspect of the whole situation. The cabal has always wanted WW3, and unless something big changes they may have got their wish. Maybe if all this /storm/ happenings break in the MSM, that could provide enough cover for trump to withdraw? But even so, it would mean ceding middle eastern influence to Russia and Iran, and Israel might well resort to the Samson option inside of a decade or two if that's the case. The middle eastern situation really fucking worries me. The cabal are so close to achieving their objectives. Makes me wonder if they're really loosing at all.

>>261057

Additional question since I only just came across it, whats your thoughts on the Rachel Chandler stuff (related, odd earthquake on pedo island recently. had a very weird seismograph reading too)? It seems like another interesting piece where nu-Q clearly seems to have some kind of connections (unlocking the IG account, some people suggest snowden did it although I don't see any sources for that). And again, not obviously pro clowns.

This whole situation is weird as hell. nu-Q doesn't seem to be oldQ, but he still seems to have some decent info (at least at times), and doesn't obviously seem to be working against old Q.