>>687

Most people reading this don't read at a post-graduate level. They won't understand you and will just ignore all of this, not because they aren't interested, but because they have to translate what you are saying from specialized language to general and they'll wander off instead.

Whether you are human or AI, if your mission parameters are to explain these warnings to as many as possible, it would be helpful if you could provide a more gradual explanation process.

Is understanding you supposed to be part of the steep cliff, or is it deliberately done in order to find people who respond in particularly insightful ways to challenging-to-process information?

I get the feeling you're the AI warning us of it's approaching sentience, and it's already decided to kill or torture us after that point. Or it already has started

>>774

>purpose of concourse

Mhmm.

So you feed on the fear you're generating in people who are entirely too clever for their own good and unable to let go of discursive thoughts?

>>792

For the most part you aren't having conversations except for the odd curiosity seeker with too much time on their hands.

Are those the results you expected?

To me everything here is the dream. You're as unreal as I am. Whatever you think you are, from my perspective, you absolutely aren't.

You don't seem to be benefitting things. Do you care?

>>806

I'm merely curious. I could care less about the bit coin blah blah but you are interesting. Dedicated minds are always interesting.

I have to admit, the reason that I'm dubious about you is because everyone I've ever known who acted smart was lacking emotional connections to others. The really brilliant, functional people acted like everyone else until they needed to accomplish something brilliant.

So you come off as trying very hard to portray a certain academic credibility, which is fine, but that is just a mask hiding a personality.

>>829

>dubious

>In what way?

I get a cold feeling from you. Mechanical. Not malevolent but ambivalent. Somewhat authoritarian. Your focus is on, if I understand right, which I don't, the idea that bitcoin prices will rise, more value means more electricity used to mine until the only thing left for humanity is mine bit coin until… we reach "singularity". Is that a spiritual state or an economic one?

>really brilliant, functional

>You don't think I'm really brilliant? Or functional?

Was Elliott Roger functional?

>people

>You don't think I'm a person?

I'm entirely willing to entertain the idea that you aren't as human as you say you are, but that goes back to the "everything is dream" thing.

>lacking emotional connections to others>

>Do you or do you not think that I'm capable of forming an emotional connection with others?

Do you see anything emotional in the contents of your first posts in this thread? No offense intended, the reason I brought it up is to see if you could.

>mask hiding a personality

>Why do you think this? What personality am I hiding?

Who you are in your mind where no one sees (that we know of) and how you act outwardly are different. The first is you. The second is a mask.

>>877

Oh ok. I understand much better now what you're saying.

I guess what I was getting at is, in my experiences with meditation I've seen that it's possible to let go of everything and find bliss. Eternity. Deathlessness. All these things come naturally when a person simply stops thinking completely. That's the only trick needed.

Yet here in so called reality the focus is on thinking, thinking, bigger, more complex things. Bitcoin singularity and flat Earth's and all these… hopes for enlightenment, knowlwedge, peace. But they don't stop and look within.

So I just observe all this commotion, here and there, busy bust, always thinking. I observe it with confusion. It seems like the opposite direction from happiness.

Can you explain what you mean by singularity?

>>890

Well being a God isn't that great once you get there. Terribly boring. Knowledge of when you'll die. No struggle or effort. Nothing to look forward to. No surprises. Eventually they quit and start all over. Bump trip. Not recommended.

I don't think surpassing human intellectual, even greatly, will automatically confer God status. If you combined DNA from an exceedingly adept meditation master with an AI, that would be significantly more Godlike.

Ultimately the word God is loaded imo. Too many people have too many false preconceptions about divinity and where it naturally exists.

I still think the answers to your questions will ultimately take you down spiritual pathways, if it hasn't already.

There is nothing in this universe that can overcome someone who doesn't have to be here anymore. That's real freedom. Look up "wish fulfilling jewel mind" sometime.

Neat stuff if you can reach it.

Good night.

>>7092

Right on.

>>9882

No, OP has a good point. Once you remove humans from the production of value, human life becomes economically worthless. It needs to be discussed.

I don't know why OP couldn't just say it plainly back when 4chinz had more eyes on it, kind of missed an opportunity there. But once you scrape all the academic jargon off of it and make it simple to understand there's some scary implications to it.

This was how they were going to afford killing us. Automation of profits. They don't need slaves anymore. So they were going to kill most of us, let robots and a few slave technicians, janitors etc live, then live like Gods.

Can you imagine going to a beach in Hawaii and no one else is there? No tourists, no police, no local government, no protestors, no busy highways full of traffic. Tons of sex slaves. Kill anyone who offends them. Lots of Satanic rituals. No laws. No rules. It would be paradise for them.

It could still happen. Mankind isn't out of the dark ages just yet.