>>104189

Its a matter of knowing the times of ancient ordination (which are very well established in Scripture) for changes to take place in what society (which is the US and in the present), and realizing the only battle of our time that makes all the difference between life and death is over truth (information). Just knowing this establishes the context to which a tremendous amount of Scripture now speaks to the same processes (call them natural or divine), and makes all the symbolic connections not too hard to figure out.

The Work at Hand

40K FOOT VIEW

From p15 of the study, under Law of Angels

The battle with Amalek was only won by Israel (western nations, today) while Moses' arms and rod were upheld. Also, Moses said: The Lord has sworn that the Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.

Moses was also told to write this event down because, as He said, I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.

So this seems to mean:

1) The people will war with Amalek throughout the ages;

2) Only upholding Moses will save the people; and

3) The whole world (under heaven) would keep forgetting about this ageless, recurring battle between Israel and this innate adversary. Amalek would not be remembered, yet the Lord swore He would continue to war with Amalek from generation to generation (seemingly, between each age, in national regeneration).

This lesson was so important it was given even before the tablets of Moses and it had to be recorded first. No doubt this was so the people would later be able to win certain, future battles (by knowing to sustain Moses) against their adversary, each time a new generation of Israelites (while beginning to "put down" Moses’ law) recognizes the new face of Amalek.

20K FOOT VIEW

From p69 of the study, in the section, Saul

The age of Saul is the age of the impulsive desires of the people. The carnal desire of the people is "king" in this time.

Many matters unique in the first age to the time of Saul also compare uniquely to the general nature of society in the third age. For one, under Saul, it was illegal to raise the dead in a séance. Similarly, in the third age, it is not accepted (prohibited by religious leaders) for people to bring the characters of ancient Scripture back to life in social affairs (recognize the same characters of force in the world - the figurative similitude of raising the dead), and even though Jesus commanded it of His disciples. Recognizing the relationships between the ancients and the comparable, modern forces of being in the present is one of the most powerful fundamentals in returning Christian doctrine to competent and timely Scriptural validity. But it cannot be done under Saul.

Saul also polluted the nation with the beasts (industries) of Amalek, and even against the express commandment of God not to do so. This is why the lowing and bleating of all the political and social chaos prevails in the land again today, just as back then. It also calls for the same condemnation by prophet of the rule of Saul.

————–

The age of Saul is the third age, from 1607 to 1997 (as per Ezekiel).

Saul represents free world leadership in this period, which came into U.S. hands.

This major mistake by Saul seems to have been since WWII, ever since which leadership in the land has been 'tainted' with the presence of "Amalekite struggles."

One of the sons of Esau (Jacob's brother) would have a son called Amalek.

This seems to be the origin of the present incarnation of Amalek in the West, as Esau has long been the figurative father of the Pharisees and Orthodox Judaism.

The root term for Amalekite means "wearisome toil." It is the means of defeating the people by wearing them out. And they have no defense against it until and unless they "uphold" Moses - because that is the only way they can recognize the reasons for it and the solutions of ancient intent.

Saul also preserved even the king of the Amalekites, Agag, whom God commanded to be slain.

The prophet would confront Saul about his disobedience to God, amid the "lowing and bleating" of the people in their struggle with the political chaos this tainting would cause. And he would subsequently slay Agag.

10K FOOT VIEW

The defeat of the Amalekites comes in the time of the subsequent leadership, that of David. This appears in Chapter 30 of I Samuel.

This may sound confusing, but it is understandable when we realize the times of these two leadership overlap. This is also one of the ways we learn time is just a metaphor for processes of change, according to the authors of sacred texts.

A great number of changes in social development take place in the current age, which is the 40 years from 1997 to 2037 (again, as per Ezikiel). And most of the Bible is written in ways that not only speak to the time certain events took place, but they are also cryptically recorded in ways that speak to this unique "focal point" 40 year period for all prophecy - that of the time after the time of man, which is the time of the son of man, or the "Children of Light" (per Jesus).

5K FOOT VIEW

The more immediate context of CBTS is found in the very first battle David and his men engaged, which was against those who were robbing the threshing floors (stealing the grain) of Kielah (I Samuel 23). The people had no bread, just as Americans today, because the vital information they need is not being supplied by the most prominent forces of the land commonly most responsible for doing so.

This is true not only of news information sources, but also thought inspiration sources - music, film, religion and of course, memes. The latter is the more personal and flexible, and together with a number of other modern trends, has the ability to help change these others at length, as well as those of information.