>>44781

Only if you're a Rothsfag shill. Hitler didn't do anything wrong, except print his own money to the behest of the royal family…

They don't like it when you don't trust their devil money. ;)

I love how leftist shitheads can sum up WWII in one sentence: "Hitler killed 6 million Jews reeeeee!"

Uhmm.. no. That's NOT what happened.. Hitler wasn't a saint by any means, but it would cost more money and time to kill that many Jews than it would to just take their stuff and kick them out of the country for trying to do their Jew 'holier than thou' monopoly thing..

Then the same people rally behind a guy (((Soros))) who was a Jew, that dressed up as a Christian, to help the workers party confiscate Jewish stuff. He's quite the opportunist..

If Hitler killed ANY jews, they were probably evil bankers who were friends with Roths and sent to destroy and break Germany financially.

History..

>>44883

Right.. wouldn't it be so weird if we were all charitable and ALL worked to help others? Geez.. that would be.. so crazy.

>>44828

>>44874

Truth!

I don't know much about bitcoin. I know it's comprised of specific and limited encrypted/hashed pieces that are shared via a P2P type network that tracks itself, but is it centralized anywhere?

Of course it's very traceable.. so I'm not sure how it would make a great laundromat, unless I'm missing something..

And if the limit gets expanded, then the price falls I assume.. but more likely, there's going to be different forms of blockchain bitcoin based on different encryption. Elliptical curve encryption still can't be broken (and maybe never will be?) by Quantum computers, but otherwise regular older RSA encryption methods will not be safe any longer except by continually adding to it's length of bits.

I'm just wondering what will happen if/when bitcoin crashes to wipe out the bad actors who are using it as a laundromat.. then it'll probably come back, but.. different? Based on EC instead?

Curious..

>>44940

Unfortunately, secret societies are the enemy of a purely transparent gov't.

They are good 'in theory' but inevitably some asshole will come along and fuck it up for everyone else, just like they always do.

Idea for new meme:

"Separation of church and state..

..includes cults" ??

I dunno. Just an idea. I'd make it, but then I'd have to switch to windows, and I don't wanna. lol

>>44961

>>44962

I'm all about having private clubs and such, however do not think they should be involved with gov't.

Of course you don't want some shithead asswipes in your club. Vetting is necessary.

But.. if you're a member of a 'private' club, then you should forfeit your right to engage in gov't because of the horrible implications, as we're already seeing..

I also realize that this is also a PERSONAL attack by a country/family that has ALWAYS wanted America for it's own, since they want to rule the planet..

But.. yeah. Separation of church (including cults) and state.

>>44969

Well then what happened? Someone not watching the gates? And what happened to 'captain' Morgan? ;)

>>44992

I did a research paper on quantum computing many years ago, but.. of the 20 or 30 sources I used, none of them were able to actually confirm that anything 2 qbits have successfully been used to create a truly quantum effect, and even then, it requires a completely different algorithm to utilize the abilities of superposition and harness the power of what I kindof just refer to as 'super bits' (I.e. not binary, but several positions, each of which can act in tandem to solve various problems - very useful for breaking encryption)

but.. don't know if that's just because they want to keep the technology 'secret'? They TALK about 10 qbit systems, but there's a difference between quasi-quantum and ACTUAL quantum..

I think Canada makes the 5 qbit machines.. but I got the feeling that it would be many moons before we saw it become mainstream due to the advanced nature of the system and an inability to create realistic 'desktop' style systems.. (these machines are pretty large)

But.. for now, we still have the old binary system for the most part.

>>45028

>albeit with consenting adults

kek

If I'm not mistaken, a few of the authors of the constitution were.. freemasons.. (obviously before they got infiltrated)

I find it funny that the average person 240+ years ago, without the internet, was probably smarter than the smartest shithead we see on television today..

Anyways.. I maintain that secret societies and private clubs are exactly the opposite of free, open, and transparent gov't..

Sure, it's nice to only have your friends at the $20,000.00-per-plate dinner to hear your plans for the next phase of ideological gov't move, but that's not how it should work… ;)

>>45103

>numerology/math has unlimited potential for secret conversation.