Anonymous ID: 41e97f Dec. 7, 2017, 4:28 p.m. No.50639   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0668

>>50566

This is interesting news in light of Q's post and doubtless related in some way, but I'm not sure it's exactly what he was getting at.

 

The rest of the post seems just so unrelated to anything regarding the actual Freedom caucus (the attempt on May, Roths, etc). Also, note the caps. Seems familiar…

 

Given their format, people have long suspected the FREEDOM stringers referred to coming indictments (possibly starting tomorrow given the numbers). Could it be that Q's "FREEDOM caucus" actually refers to those about to be indicted, ie members of congress who soon will be wishing they had freedom?

Anonymous ID: 41e97f Dec. 7, 2017, 4:40 p.m. No.50696   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0729 >>0739

>>50668

Yeah. Don't think the Freedom caucus is unimportant here. Q writing it in all caps like in his stringers I just think is significant. Makes me think he was more pointing back there with it.