Anonymous ID: 47f3af Dec. 7, 2017, 2:53 p.m. No.50265   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0268 >>0283

>>50024

Whatever Q means by "shutdown" there is no way he can know for certain whether the government will be shut down. Congress is a major factor. It would be like predicting the winner of a horse race.

So either Q meant there is a contingency plan for government shutdown, or Trump is willing to play brinksmanship to the point of government shutdown, or else a different "shutdown" entirely.

Anonymous ID: 47f3af Dec. 7, 2017, 2:56 p.m. No.50280   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>50040

>Use Stroke on the font so there is a small black border on the letterโ€ฆ.

Good technical advice on meme making, anon, thank you!!

Might be a good thing to have in the meme thread if not already there, or some sort of tech sticky.

Anonymous ID: 47f3af Dec. 7, 2017, 3 p.m. No.50295   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>50069

Correction - stringer keywords identify upcoming event after it has occurred.

Q only points us to these to understand how they explain current events or to signify something about timing (as in the Nov 25 stringer related to the Nov 27 Hussein video). AFTER the event.

There is no indication we are supposed to be able to make sense of these before anything occurs, which would be a terrible idea on Q's part for reasons of operational security anyway.

Anonymous ID: 47f3af Dec. 7, 2017, 3:16 p.m. No.50370   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>50268

POTUS would not decide the government needs to be shut down willy nilly, that would be stupid. And that is not how it works.

Anything could happen in Congress either to make a shutdown more or less likely depending on who has leverage in negotiations.

Anonymous ID: 47f3af Dec. 7, 2017, 3:18 p.m. No.50379   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>50283

Right. For instance, Hillary in handcuffs would give POTUS massive negotiating advantage and make shutdown moot. You would not get a government shutdown if the Democrats cave on everything.