I just read DW’s report on LV yesterday. It kinda kept me awake thinking last night. DW’s report implied that the concert venue was set up for maximum casualties.

In a recent phone call with someone I know, I learned:

Someone else I know has a friend who was at SB and LV. (What are the odds? Seriously? No coincidences.)

The link appears to have been that both invitations came from the teacher organization in SB.

It seemed that this was a free thing for the recipients, but I don’t know for sure. That needs investigation.

Whatever the connection was with SA, I am convinced that was not the only thing going on during that event. It IS possible for LV to be this AND that, and we need to make sure the various angles are covered. This was not a simple event. It has layers to it.

That said, I think the following needs to be answered:

How was the concert marketed?

Who got tickets to the concert?

What groups were giving away tickets to the concert?

Do any of these groups have connection with agencies such as Crowds on Demand?

Was this part of the event intended to eliminate witnesses?

Who organized this?

Who has been hunting down vocal survivors?

How did this get connected to the SA part of the event?

How do those preparedness drills tie into it all?

Why are people including emergency personnel saying that no one got shot?

>>55214

>You ever have a feeling someone might be watching you?

All the time. Being pro-Trump has been an uneasy journey. Plus, living in CA, I feel like I'm in enemy territory. But this mess won't go away by going into denial.

>MY BRAIN IS TELLING TO FULLFILL A ROLE THAT TO MY KNOWLEDGE DOESN'T EVEN EXIST

That's me, too. I have felt compelled to share stuff with people. One of my friends was at risk of getting involved in the wrong side of things. Secretly, he was one of my targets when I shared things on social media. But I also wanted people in general to understand the hypocrisy of what was going on. It seems a lot of people value words over deeds when it should be the other way around. "By their fruits ye shall know them." I sometimes think I should get paid for my drive to research and report, but I don't. I do it because something compels it.

>I think my purpose is far bigger than I imagined

Have you ever had one of those dreams of doing something about the truth that was just so real you couldn't shake it off after waking up? Night work, they call it. I had one of those. In this case, the dream was some type of counsel meeting setting. Then I learned about something that had happened in the waking world that showed me it wasn't a mere dream. Can't prove it, of course. But I am convinced not everything happens in this 3D world. I have no idea of the details of how it was fulfilled in the 3D world. While I have published several stories of those weird little things that happen, I don't share this one. And I'll just leave that there now. No coincidences.

But tell us: What was it that upset you about geophysics?

>>55585

Your comment gave me chills, too. That is how the angels tell me something is true. Bless you.

>>55492

OK, you don't need to say anything about the concert attendees list here. But I don't think that is random, either. That was the point. If you're not looking at how those people got there, you may miss a big piece of this. Just please at least confirm it's part of the investigation.

>>55447

OMG! Where did you find that statement??? No wonder this normally non-political person felt that this election really mattered and became politically active. It really was do or die.

>>55655

>Prophecy is A VERY ADULT topic

As true as that may be, it's only tangentially important here. We need stuff – details – that could be used to prove a case in court.

>>55667

Yes, I understand that part. But a quote like that must have a source. Otherwise, we're just throwing blind accusations around.

>>55699

No CHIP reauthorization???? Scary that she considers that important.

>>55699

The sickest thing in there was about family planning. By the time a woman is pregnant, it isn't planning anymore. It's on the way, in my view of things. Having experienced the ingress of the souls of my children at the time of conception (not a common experience, I gather), aborting is unthinkable.

As for the Climate Accord, it seems that a virtuous name on something is enough to get people to support it until the end. They see virtue in the words and don't look past them.

I can see a meme: a pile of sh*t with the words in quotes above it, "This is a rose." and something at the bottom saying something about a virtuous name not making the thing virtuous.

I don't know enough about the Iran agreement to speak to that part of it.

Did I leave anything out?