re: 72477: There seems to be improper "context" mixing the conclusions as presented in your statement/question (re: CERN-Higgs/Boson, Sum of all Fears).
------------
In using a full database of all of Q's posts, a thread of developing context and definition develop.
A common specific context and definition has been developing in Q's "leading answer" patterns, past breadcrumbs, and new keys dropped in fresh messages.
The graphic (72023) includes very key Q postings that are the most recent relevant associative pattern matchings to the code name and context associated with RED.
However, there is much more that wasn't put into the graphic that continues to specify the relevant associative links to RED. The other common strong link to RED has been CROSS. (RED CROSS full capital text verses Red Cross organization distinction made by Q).
In (57707) the STRINGER code T:B, F, J is decoded that reveals these character sequences form a "CROSS" on the Qwerty keyboard keys. The colon ":" is in the center keyboard row where the "T" and the "B" are in the top and bottom rows. This vertical colon is a "key" to reveal the "visual" importance to the T and the B. Thus the horizontal located F and J keys form the horizontal of the "CROSS".
>>57707
The Nov 25 stringers were at the point Q started to encode "Qwerty" keyboard coding into messages. Before this there were spelling, and font related subcodes, besides the original 4, 10, 20 to alphabetical codings.
Yet this new Qwerty encoding has been misunderstood (such as the letters meaning the first characters in a name, names, or acronyms). If you apply the prior context of Q's postings, the code & full intended context of Q's messages begin to reveal themselves.
Sometimes, it the full answer is not completely developed until a final key or keys are dropped. However, the confidence of the context grows until it is completely distinct. Q reminds that there are intentional "multiple-meanings" and this should always be considered.
Ex: RED CROSS verses the Red Cross organization distinction Q made. There are other multiple-meanings that have not been fully defined on other items, but stated by Q as such (multiple meanings).
Q has made several reveals of the symbol of evil (666) in early postings. The Nov 25 11:22:21 post is where Q encoded a "CROSS" (T:B, F, J) with "666" (1,5,11-20, ^). Then Dec 4, Q further developed the context of righteous justice to the severity of the crime in stating "these people deserve death".
This same message had RED Haiti, Children, $ as the "leading answers" to the topic. The common pattern developing is RED is directly associated with children & trafficking ("Since POTUS elected what changed w/ RED" - arrests all over the US in child trafficking rings).
ON Dec 4 Q's posts had RED, RED RED, and RED CROSS RED RED. So the patterns, associations, and seriousness of the crimes were revealing themselves in further context & messages. (see below)
What is so important about the big stringer (Nov 25) is that Q revealed a code message so powerful that the BH's reacted by crashing/attacking halfchan. They unleashed a full attack noted by Q from Snow White (supercomputer resources et al).
So what was it in the stringer that was so damaging? When doing the decoding, it was very revealing how elegantly Q et al had embedded RED twice and CHILDREN within the individual subcode characters on the lines (z,b,c….). The method of also imbedding the decipher keys (38) and (76) added new layers to the challenge.
Clearly, this subcode message was very damaging (to the bad actors), yet very important for Q to have decoded (that's why Q kept pushing for decoding).
What it reveals is most shocking. Q will reveal more evidence that will sustain & re-inforce this shocking information. This has been the pattern.
For those that say this decoding is nonsense. If you took the combinations "in reverse" to end up with so many exact matching conditions, the probability becomes nil (character exact match (8 characters with 2 encoding keys and a third serving as a key and a character), exact mis-spelling of switching the "R" location with the "D" location to get "RED", the second reverse "RED" embedded in the reverse sequence from the first 38 key). It was pure genius from Q. The encoding elegance was astounding, yet it required a very sophisticated encoding method to achieve what they did.
The pattern & key rotations used matched the prior methods Q used in messages, but those did not have the additional layers of "keys" included as this one did.
Every single line required the key of 38. Without 38 the whole pattern becomes random (skewed in clustering to both ends of the spread in the alphabet).
A very very elegant encoding by Q.
1/2