The Break:

Trump's entire speech was about a break.

Basically every section had that as the theme, "that is what was done before, we are not doing that anymore."

Especially, the centerpiece, the "evil" people who have protected the status quo and are working to protect it still. This is why it is so hard to drain the swamp. This is why it is so hard to lock her up.

But, Trump emphasized over and over, we are doing it. With frequent nods to the military and justice.

I really think that is the break Q speaks of. If we look at it that way perhaps more of the crumbs fall into place. Also, perhaps there is a strong need, soon, for redoubling the meme effort. Trump needs our help, We are not to stop fighting.

Final note: Q frequently reprimands us to "expand" our thinking. This is because our tendency is to do the exact opposite, to focus in, to decipher letters in a word rather than read the word.

I could be wrong, maybe we are supposed to interpret "BREAK" as an acronym, after all the spooks use codes, but I see that leading to some rabbit holes.

Lord's Prayer:

Per Q post at bottom, from last night.

On November 14, Q posted the "Catholic" version, leaving out the "For thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory forever" that Protestants usually include.

Q also used "trespasses" instead of debts – this is not so much a Catholic identifier, many Protestants say the same, but still, Catholic version.

So I think what Q was referring to last night was the fact of the Roman Catholic Lord's Prayer as something that was on Q's radar, meaning that

A) Q either pays attention to the Catholic Church, or B) that the Vatican is part of this entire picture, or C) that Q himself is a Catholic.

Actually, it would well signal all 3.

What just came out, obviously, is the Pope is proposing a change in language to the Lord's Prayer, which will have some relevance for Catholics and probably zero relevance for most Protestants.

It is a presumptuous thing for the Pope to take on, and a questionable priority. Sociologically, it tells us the Pope has a high opinion of himself. Humble servants of the Lord would not be concerned with changing a prayer that has been in use for over 2000 years.

I am not ready to delve into the theological implications …. but, again, reading Q at the simplest level, he told us last night that the Catholic Church has been in his thinking throughout this project.

And, the Catholic Church current leadership, is puffed up with its own importance, looking to make changes.

<Q !ITPb.qbhqo 12/09/17 (Sat) 13:12:19

News unlocks map.

Future proves past.

Why was the Lord's prayer posted?

Which version?

Why is this relevant?

What just came out re: the Lord's prayer?

What can be connected?

Do you believe in coincidences?

Re-review the map post relevant news drops.

Godfather III.

Q

>>63104

Yes, totally agree.

I picture Q, after his drops, watching where the anons take it, and shaking his head ruefully, saying "My gosh these people are nuts."

Some good stuff emerges from the chaos which presumably he appreciates. He probably is figuring out autism.

Also presumably Q cuts us slack for the fact there are people on CBTS purposefully creating rabbit holes for anons to fall into. IMO there is a fair amount of disingenuous writing on there. Having this thread is a big help.

Lord's Prayer continued:

Just saw this from another anon, which adds something important to what I wrote above

>>>/cbts/63283

>Lord's prayer is foreknowledge of the change suggested by Pope

Perhaps Q has inside knowledge of Vatican. Interesting thought.

BTW in post above I meant to write "Actually, it COULD well signal all 3." I have no idea if Q is a Catholic.

>>62695

When Q has referred to timestamps in the past I think it has always been to establish precedence, to note the order things took place and the date they took place.

In last night's post Q could simply be asking us to note precedence and proximity.

As the anon above noted, it would be pretty tough to predict the times events would take place down to the minute.

It would even be really hard to time one's Twitter post or 8ch post to appear at a specific minute. So maybe deciphering the exact times of the two posts down to the minute is reading it wrong.

<<63309

>>63369

I don't follow why you made these posts. Are the Q related?

apologies if I am missing some Q post about computers on 9/11

If these are not related to the topic they should be removed from this thread.

>>63497

huh, well it goes right over my head but I guess i'm not the sharpest knife in the drawer. thanks

>>63542

Probably he is. What he definitely says over and over is that events happening in the world will make it easier to interpret the crumbs he drops.

Q posts may not make sense now, but we will see what they mean as events unfold.

Then, knowing what we know, we will be able to inform people of the true significance of events, and the justification of the events, and counteract the screeching of those attempting to paint POTUS' actions in the wrong light.

>>63584

These are not in the Q book.

Looks like made-up Q.

>>63768

Interesting, Probably should go in a dedicated "swamp cleaning" or military corruption thread if there is one.

Well it looks like this is straying from Q Analysis.

BO, my heart goes out to you because this is complicated – maybe scan the content here, see if it helps evolves the concept. There seems to be a tendency to make this an alternate CBTS thread.

On a positive note, Q just appeared in CBTS #72 again with some very interesting stuff.

>>63871

No I'm sorry dude, I meant the original posts with links about the computers, not your explanation, I appreciated the explanation.

Still trying to clarify the concept here and I understand there is a fine line between staying on topic and quashing discussion.