or not.
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=74090
thats great. just remember that if they say it was an emp they are lying.
from the very same article:
-
Starfish Prime, which was an outright attempt to generate a devastating EMP over the Pacific. BLACKOUTS? ZERO. Not on ONE SINGLE PACIFIC ISLAND ANYWHERE. Not in Tahiti, not in Hawaii, not on a single destitute atoll, folks absolutely NOTHING happened that could be definitively attributed to an EMP.
-
Tsar Bomba, The largest nuclear weapon ever detonated was an air burst (which makes EMP far worse) triggered absolutely NO BLACKOUTS while it broke windows 560 miles away and created mayhem for radio. PUT YOUR THINKING CAPS ON FOLKS AND DO NOT JUST BLINDLY BELIEVE, if even Tsar Bomba failed to trip a blackout anywhere, EMP is BULLSHIT, PERIOD.
accidentaly picked a clip with weird stuff in the end
what a great argument.
ill post link again for everyone:
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=74090
"So the claim is 30 light bulbs blew out in Honolulu and the starter motor in one guy's car quit. So what? How many light bulbs does Honolulu have? How many cars? At least 50,000 cars at that time. Gee, I'd expect to have to change a starter once every 50,000 days! No doubt Honolulu has at least a million light bulbs. 30 quit? blaming that on a bomb is stupid when light bulbs only lasted a year at most. How many really burned out that night? thousands, from normal use."
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=74090
yes i can buy that. but if you are so close to a nuke then maybe losing electricity is not your biggest problem.
jim stone also says in the article:
"There is only ONE type of scenario where EMP makes sense: You are within 30 miles of a BIG bomb. Then something might trip or blow out, but chances are you're dead anyway."
THE break?