This is very straight forward.
11 Dec 04:29 (gmt) - Q posted: Blunt & Direct Time.
11 Dec 04:32 (gmt) - Q posted: False flag(s) …. Expect fireworks
Note the unnecessary capitalisation in the first phrse. At the time I searched BDT and the Bangladeshi currency came up but I disregarded it….but remember:
>News unlocks the map
>Future proves past
So when I heard the news mention the NYC bomber was Bangladeshi = map is unlocked.
Solution = Q knew the bomber was Bangladeshi at 04:29 (gmt) today. Q knew there would be attempted false flag(s). There would be fireworks rather than a real bomb. Therefore Q is real is an insider and the other info we have been given is also true.
How do we demonstrate to people that this isn't just 4chan style conspiracy nonsense?
Our job is to identify things in the news that will the demonstrate the validity of what Q is posting. These are merely a mechanism for us to use when trying to convince normies of the important truths that Q has shared ie Obama/HRC corruption, U1 deal, Saudi bribery and blackmail, CIA evil etc