thanks for quoting me (73602) Seems the most logical explanation that I can see. Hopefully Q will confirm before others distort it. Really easy to do though. Q gives us crumbs, but can misread them, I know I made my own stab in the dark before others clarified. Gets spun off in all directions until Q gets fed up (remember keystone)
Dunno, but "experts" can be read in the same manner as "confidential sources" Worth pointing out, but even truepundit can get it wrong at times."Ashley Shen, an independent security researcher told Sky news" (Sky news? couldn't get better place than that to report to\?) Proxys and Hive can obscure true origin. Take with pinch of salt until truly independent sources confirm. This is Imho, Take it as you will.