Anonymous ID: 50ab24 Dec. 12, 2017, 4:15 a.m. No.79866   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9882

>>79864

>It is a message nobody would bother to encode.

And yet here you are on a board dedicated to following a right hand man of POTUS who has been dropping dozens of similarly coded messages. Clown detectedโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 50ab24 Dec. 12, 2017, 4:30 a.m. No.79884   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9892

>>79873

Good, so let's recap.

>Seems like a silly message to bother encoding

That's your argument right?

>By the message you "revealed" would never have been encoded in the first place, because the message itself would not have meant anything to anyone.

This a) isn't English and b) doesn't make any sense at all. There is a definite message in that text by Q. He doesn't just highlight letters for fun. We know this from studying his previous posts. What is it? I took a stab at it. You're saying a s reveal would never have been encoded in the first place because it would not mean anything to anyone.

Anonymous ID: 50ab24 Dec. 12, 2017, 4:46 a.m. No.79904   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9948

>>79892

>Ha ha ha ha ha. This is how you spend your life?

Indeed. Creating and running this board takes much time.

>Adam Schiff reveal IS worth encoding, if that was the hidden meaning. Obviously. There are likely 100s of other things that could be hidden in there that could be worth encoding.

That's just what I was claiming.

>But the message YOU discerned about "owls living in the Light" or whatever bullshit it is is NOT worth encoding because It. Means. Nothing.

I did not write that note mousebrain neither did I claim it was something encoded. Someone with an owl tattoo posted 10 minutes after Q's owl post. That's what HIS handwritten note said.

>You discovered, Nothing.

You cannot, Read.

>So your interpretation scheme is, Wrong.

Your comprehension is, Nonexistent.

>And I think you might be, Stoned.

Stone cold sober actually.

>One more thing, dude: You realize by now that the stringers are not mainly meant for us, right? He pointed out long ago that others are usongnthe crumbs. Even if you knew what you were doing, the task is not a great use of time, most likely.

Duh. That's exactly what my image says. Did you read it? No, because you're fucking stupid.

Anonymous ID: 50ab24 Dec. 12, 2017, 5:30 a.m. No.79990   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>79986

I don't filter. Gotta see everything. Future proves past. Must redpill the normies. Some friends are amazed I told them there would be a bombing on Monday done by a Bangladeshi - and there was.