>>79585

They manage to "recruit" because we humans are easily drawn to a teaching which says anything goes (do what thou wilt) and infers that we can evolve to enlightenment by embracing relativistic truth and morals, along with seeking "godhood/christ consciousness" via ever more knowledge (of good and evil). It's the oldest trick in the book.

The whole "island visiting philosophy" they embrace looks a lot like a fulfilment of prophecy:

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears…"

If you'd stayed in the cult long enough or become a high enough "adept", what you would have found out about the penultimate philosophy and practices - which one would hope, would have left you convinced that there were no redeeming features. Just an onion layered mass of "alluring" deceptions drawing people in via a "wide path", with a core of evil at the very centre.

We don't want to redpill people with "illumination" for interest's sake - we want to wake people up with the truth revealed by Q and the keystone massive, so the dark cabal are exposed for what they are, disempowered then destroyed, and the victims can be freed to live a life of peace and joy.

>>79629

It's old tech, and quite possible.

If true, the question would be who sold/gave said tech it to him?

Look up the document "Weather as a Force Multiplier- Owning the Weather in 2025 vol3ch15"

It was presented to Air Force in 1996…

>>79654

HAARP wasn't mentioned in the document, so doesn't seem to be a necessary component.

Here's a copy pasta of the Exec Summary of the doc:

Executive Summary

In 2025, US aerospace forces can “own the weather” by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to shape the battlespace in ways never before possible. It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.

A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification, the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril. From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. Some of the potential capabilities a weather-modification system could provide to a war-fighting commander in chief (CINC) are listed in table 1.

Technology advancements in five major areas are necessary for an integrated weather-modification capability: (1) advanced nonlinear modeling techniques, (2) computational capability, (3) information gathering and transmission, (4) a global sensor array, and (5) weather intervention techniques. Some intervention tools exist today and others may be developed and refined in the future.

Attached (pic) is the "Operational Capabilities Matrix"

Bear in mind wherever the capabilities are now, it's 21 years later than when this doc was initially presented in 1996.

Thankfully "the storm coming" which we're primarily discussing here, is one we actually want.

http ://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

>>79693

This is a speculative doc based on emerging technologies and research at the time, so your guess is as good as mine.

Some may be natural and well beyond our human capabilities to control?