Will Q drop tasty crumbs in this warm bread?

Monday was a bit of a letdown. Yes, the NYC failed bomb was SOMETHING, and it's good nobody was hurt, but I think we were all hoping for something bigger.

Especially given the 4th quarter hint, the military aircraft over DC last night, and the rumors about dozens of "congress cads" being outted. If all that amounted to something, now THAT would have been a Monday!

>>81299

>tfw reality doesn't match a movie.

Yeah, this is turning out to be more like a mini-series.

When Q said:

>My fellow Americans, over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country

…"next several days" sounded pretty short term. It's fine that this is a longer plot, but to manage expectations, it'd be helpful to know if the storm's climax is days, weeks, months, or years away.

>>81302

Okay. But I want to see known bad guys get their nuts blown up, more than some low-level pawn we've never heard of before.

4th Quarter is final boss time.

>>81308

Your spreadsheet is superb. Thank you for your fine work.

>>81276

I hope that's not the case. Bread needs steady attention.

>>81371

>u looking 4 another 911?!????

hell no. The opposite. The final act where the clowns are revealed and the cabal's masters are publicly locked up.

>>81457

is this something Q's team has any absolute control over? Isn't the shutdown or lack of shutdown up to the whim of congress?

Clear this up for me: is the Rothschild side of the triangle up or down?

Saud is obvious in the news. What news do we have of Rothschild? Everytime we think Lynn is being scooped up, she's continues blathering on Twitter. Major Rothschild arrests (similar to Saud) is what we're really missing here.

Help me understand this, too:

Q lays things out in riddles. I assume this is because the enemy is watching this space and speaking truth plainly on this board would cause problems.

But if that's the case, why is okay for us anons to answer the questions? Assuming we answer correctly, the truth is plainly written on this board.

What difference does it make which anon (us or Q) types forbidden truths?

>>81543

Good point, anon.

Q's "coincidences" help his legitimacy. It's a good idea have these handy.

>>81615

I like this answer, because it make sense Q would want to remain lawful in all disclosures. But if Y Family information is actually classified by the US government (seriously?), POTUS could have declassified all of this long ago.

>>81636

Q has said "Merry Christmas" twice now. Happenings on Christmas Day?

>>81657

Right. But Q does occasionally "confirm" anon answers, which is may be seen as disclosing classified information. So really, anything Q is allowed to confirm COULD have been communicated plainly.

>>81690

Thank you. By the way, I loaded up your spreadsheet just now and got a phishing warning (for the first time). Geez.

>>81724

I was more thinking /ourguys/ are choosing that day for mass arrests. One can dream.

>>81694

I like it. Ho ho ho!