>We should try to make our content friendly towards new people as long as they don't disturb.
I agree with being friendly, but a little distrubance isn't always a bad thing.
Explaining why we think such and such about a certain subject or Q question will just reinforce our own ability to explain it others.
>mfw if you can't explain it you don't understand it
> Mueller surrounded himself with liberal losers, so when the bomb drops that there is no collusion or laws broken by Trump, NO ONE could say his team was biased.
NO ONE could say his team was biased in Trumps favor
I've been watching this for a while and I have a thought.
Q has advised us that misdirection is necessary.
For whatever reason Mueller was chosen as special counsel. If we suppose that Mueller knew from the onset that the only real collusion with Russians was the U1 deal etc… How better to assure everyone of Trumps innocence than if a pack of liberal anti-Trump attack dogs can't find anything to charge him with?
It's why Rosenstein is satisfied
It's why Sessions is satisfied
It's why Trump is satisfied
All of Trump';s people have been interviewed by Mueller's team, they are done, results to be given soon.
It's all been a diversion while Sessions racks up those sealed indictments.
> Blood in my veins! Both an indication of Guilt!
by your actions and deeds thou shall be judged