>>93921

If it's a printout from a webpage of a gannett news article, I assume we are supposed to find that article.

Q's clue was the graphic at the top, which might be the text logo. And the photo of the "boy, boy/girl" which sounds like one might be a trans, or so young that it's hard to determine gender.

Maybe look for articles that came out around the same time as the photo. Looks like that is around Oct 12, 2012. Unless someone finds otherwise.

For example: http://news.blogs. cnn.com/2012/10/12/texas-mom-gets-99-years-for-gluing-toddler-to-wall-beating-her/ "…Before this incident, Escalona had been investigated by Texas Child Protective Services but never arrested or charged… The child welfare agency put all of her children in foster care…"

>>94059 >>94045

The earliest date I found it online was Oct 7 2012.

Maybe someone can also cross check the date of this tweet of the pic, by @BravoAndy >>93506

>>94094

Nice. Yeah, Q said "Watchers will now erase from web."

>>94103

Agreed.

>>94045

>>94127

Good find.

Also found these news items around that timeframe in case any turn out to be what Q wants us to find:

https://www.cnn. com/2012/10/04/world/asia/china-landslide-school/index.html

https://www.cnn. com/2012/10/02/world/asia/hong-kong-ferry-survivors/index.html

http://news.blogs. cnn.com/2012/10/02/farmer-eaten-by-his-own-hogs/

http://news.blogs.cnn. com/2012/10/01/michigan-woman-charged-with-collecting-welfare-after-1-million-lottery-win-found-dead/

>>94233

So you are saying that there is a smaller cutout that includes the pic with two people, which is separate from the regular sized page behind it?

I thought it was just a printout of an article whose main body is in between the sidebars & ads of a webpage. Q indicated the graphic at the top, and the photo is connected, so not sure how your theory fits that.

>>94253

I know what you mean. It's worth considering. I still think it's more likely a webpage printout that formatted badly to printer.

Assuming you are right, where does that lead you? I'm not sure it would help identify the content, other than to know that we don't need to search for whatever the text logo at the top is.

>>94336

Would be good to confirm so we can move on either way. Can you post another example of such a Gannett article or website showing that logo?

>>94351

There have been many reports of this around the world over the last few weeks or months. Some think it is underground bases/labs/shelters being destroyed.

I don't think there is a separate thread for it on 8chan cbts, but you should be able to find theories about it online.

strangesounds .org/2017/11/loud-booms-usa-november-2017-increase.html (not familiar with that site, just found it with a search)

>>94362

Yes we understand the fake news aspect. There should be more to this photo than that, unless you can explain why Q hinted to "enhance" and focus on the image in the article showing a "boy, boy/girl."