Anonymous ID: cead28 Dec. 14, 2017, 12:06 p.m. No.97153   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>97122

Q would have known that photo of Coop was a compromising photo before it was posted (SIGINT)

Occult significance of left hand = "with a sharp knife cut deeply the middle finger of your left hand eat the pain" via abramovic

Anonymous ID: cead28 Dec. 14, 2017, 12:35 p.m. No.97349   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7381 >>7422

>>97324

bigger picture: WHY be an occultist?

What do you get from it?

if you don't get anything from it, WHY on Earth would you ever do it?

think about the stigmatization of the occult: no one wants to be associated to it

so therefore it may be surmised

they get something from it

what do they get?

how do they get it?

satan gives them fame, fortune, power, influence, beauty, and perhaps the ability to live on forever on Earth

my deduction is that this is exactly why Jesus must return as spoken in Revelation

it would be the only way to wipe them out

because a death of the flesh doesn't matter if satan allows you to transfer your soul into a trafficked child who can grow up to have fame, fortune, power, etc.

Anonymous ID: cead28 Dec. 14, 2017, 12:50 p.m. No.97455   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7487 >>7634

>>97381

i think there's a lot to it as in

as in - they actually DO get something

we know from the Bible that Satan is real

we know evil is on Earth

so they do get something

on YT earlier this year I found a lot of people talking about "blood over intent"

check it out

don't fuckin do it

but look

Anonymous ID: cead28 Dec. 14, 2017, 12:57 p.m. No.97493   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>97470

the red cross goes way back (the symbol)

think crusades

think english royalty

meanwhile

the Bible says Jesus was crucified on a "stauron" (the greek word stauron)

it was not a cross

it was a stake

people call me a mormon for saying this

i'm not

i'm a Bible believer

what i'm saying is this

the "cross" as a whole was co-opted

consider the star of remphan (the red sign, the rothschild) was originally blood red

Anonymous ID: cead28 Dec. 14, 2017, 1:27 p.m. No.97683   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>97623

>Textus Receptus is solid

>other knowledge of things like codex sinaiticus

checks out

you know things

as you know as well, things fit the scripture in several different ways - when I say that satan can't destroy it because of John 1:1, I mean that satan can't annihilate it and make it begoneโ€ฆ Didn't mean that a pile of Bibles couldn't be burned by satan working through a man or army.

You don't post much. You should post more.

Anonymous ID: cead28 Dec. 14, 2017, 1:57 p.m. No.97844   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>97739

logical, too.

legally speaking, add the fact that a FISA warrant was granted and then it was acted upon, and the action was spying and covert record collection which targeted a political candidate

add the fact that it was an "opposition" candidate

and (as far as legally, idk) while aiding a political opponent

Trump said it was McCarthyism.

McCarthyism - [The American Heritage Dictionary gives the definition of McCarthyism as: 1. The political practice of publicizing accusations of disloyalty or subversion with insufficient regard to evidence; and 2. The use of methods of investigation and accusation regarded as unfair, in order to suppress opposition.]

source: https://www.eisenhower.archives.gov/research/online_documents/mccarthyism.html

just look at what wikipedia says about mccarthyism - demogogic - use the President Eisenhower Library instead

bottom line

Obama is responsible for Strzok's crimes. Strzok couldn't have done it without McCabe's or Comey's approval, McCabe couldn't have done it without Comey's approval, Comey couldn't have done it without Obama's approval

the risk if they did?

man i'd hate to imagine, considering they don't hesitate to sacrifice and eat babies