>Fortunately, I don't think I mention Q much.
I did occasionally, won't be hard to change the information should stand on it's own is a long held belief.
Part of the reason some of the big accounts are mostly annoying.
To much Ego
>good mods… can't be worse than /qresearch
Yeah I was thinking it is probably time to consider coming out from cover anyway, yesterday.
We have a comfy group and we can foster the same in others who come here.
We are here for love, good, and humanity.
Ego can BTFO.
Hey Cee,
Should we add this link
>>>/qrmemes/
to pic related breads
>Gerbil asshoe
If EC does anything it only reflects poorly on them in the end.
It will be recorded as further evidence, and to the greatest extent squashed when possible.
If EC has time to come here and cause problems it only proves they aren't a misguided anon, but a true enemy, and will be dealt with as such.
At some point we have to gather the forces and work together.
We can deal with the sad sacks as needed.
Another thing you might do to test is pass through https://remove.bg
it scans the image likely similar to how the algo inspects the image on the bit level
if remove.bg can't recognize it twatter probably won't either
Since Q suggested the squares I've considered at length that it likely means they use scanning versus some form of hash identifier
Might also try the blanks I posted last night for memes.