dindu
> we've all learned a lot from this
selective editing, the trololo posts were replies to an anon who posted the classic one. these are versions by other singers, nothing to do with the bake
those guys aren't me at all, but i can see the confusion - lowercase type, using "welp"…
not being involved in the rivalry/war, i was happy to put whatever the war room anon wanted in there, especially since regular bakers were tired of them and somewhat irritated, and there were regular tensions over that.
>absolutely gone
no it isn't, it's in the dough
>don't know what WR means.
yeah, had a legit brainfreeze and didnt make the WR connect as war room immediately
> that was a confusing bread
yes, it was soon after a big Q blitz and there were mistakes in the caps, a missing Q post, and a dead link in globals.
baker did a fine job catching notables and posting bread but didn't catch all the updates - i had seen them though, and had just kept updating the paste i was working on, naturally.
figured the baker could just grad what he needed or go with the whole thing, he chose the latter.
>Is this one strange, or is it me?
i can confirm i am not a separate personality of gerbil
yup, lots of anons might say "welp".
or another expression.
ooooh, how it tickles the almonds, eh?
ooooh, how it just flavors the dig with such thrill of discovery?
thing is, in this case the bubble bursts, because i never set foot in endchan, i'm not that anon talking about hijacking the dough. not sure how to be believable to you other than tell you, though.
but what i can tell everyone is to be careful with your conclusions, and interpretations of evidence. last few days of OSS have more than shown how gruesome it can get, sadly.
so, appreciate the effort and intent in the presentation, but regretfully have to recognize there are flaws as well.