good evening anons o7
> Also try to scope out the size of the notables page early, plan for a one- or two-page notables section.
This is something I do upon initial dough inspection. I hate messy note sections, try not to leave them for oncoming bakers.
What is a messy note section? One that exceeds 5000 characters.
>if i lose touch with the flow, can get disoriented
that's a good way to describe it actuallyโฆ It's like a reset button was hit and now I gotta retrain the sights..
I always:
1) work from a local notes blank, as a separate tab. nothing gets typed into the boxes, it is all pasted from local to aid the proofread.
2) figure out the note section size and what needs to be done to it, on first dough inspection
3) re-save the received dough as the new bread number. I never work from the received copy. this way you can run winmerge (or similar) on the received copy against a master dough if you suspect bullshit.
4) bread title is figured out by 300-450 very latest depending on bread speed and what anons give me for ammo.
5) have a new thread box open, with a title and post image inserted by 450 at the latest.
6) have a final, saved local paste that will be transmitted to pastebin ready, before pasting the headpost. Pastebin usually gets the new paste just before I wait for the new thread to actuallyโฆ make.
That's all I got. YMMV
>Dealing with Shills
My only addition for anyone looking for faqs on shills:
The clown doc. Read it again. Especially the first paragraph It was written as a crash course, and if an anon is baking they should have at least been around long enough to know what they are not to waste time on them. Says so in the OP. Especially while baking.
If any poster starts wasting your time due to inorganic insatiability, answer them with memes. not text. It works for bakers too. Tested multiple times since the doc was written two years ago.
The clowns' sole intent will be to waste your time. IF they can make you look foolish while doing so, that's a bonus for them. They will use any method to do it. If they wasted your time for more than two responses on your part, they were successful.
If a respondent is not happy with your accommodations, they won't be. Document it publicly and move on. The shills are known to bitch about one thing in a bread, then bitch about opposite of that same thing, very next bread.,
>answer them with memes. not text.
ps- This is really only warranted if the shill starts hugging the fuck out of you. Most times a reasoned response will be enough, as long as you are resolute in moving forward __with the bread.
WWG1WGA.
> For a personal attack targeting you:
Looks good so far. This is appropriate to include, imo. If anyone tries to project undeserved accusations at any baker, the gloves should come off. Self-defense is a thing war correspondents appreciate; Bakers are the digital version of that..
-t. kekโฆ
>Wow. I can believe it, just never saw it.
Can confirm. Never baked anything that fast but was present for it. Didn't quite believe it was happening. The ppm meter in the q tools lite .js just didn't like it at allโฆ Then the bread was full.
I wish I had a cap, kek..