Hi all o7
He seemed like he was speaking out about it because of the wedge he knows it will introduce.
Same reason why I've declined pursuing the idea of being any kind of baker authority in meta..
>past practices
here's my oldest proof that peer review baker checks are nothing new. The shills can eat some shit.
If you'll notice, it is old enough for this post in pic relates, to be in Globals.
My only response to anyone going forward about this retardation, will be mockery.
This lines up with this baker's remembrance of events.
This is why board moderation at /qr/ is essentially neutered down to only getting rid of cp and egregious shit.
fwiw, the main reason why the "entire buffalo" trope is funny to this baker is because in retrospect, it makes the subsequent Q smackdown mean more.
fair enough.
The context for me was the idea that Q very blatantly made him know that "the entire buffalo" absolutely included him.
Shadilay o7
>theory
aside from the mechanics previously discussed.. I tend to look for shit that rings true. if it rings true, I'll note it
If I can't decide, it goes into another list. if anons corroborate that with another post, then it hits the main notelist.
Reason why is, in my perspective, my job as an anon does not end just because I happen to be the baker.
If anons do not like my notes, they have told me, and they get removed.
Easy easy. Posting notes often helps anons help you.
the gravey crew is legit. I'll be available for some bakes in a couple breds if the connection stays good
So let me get this straight.
People are bitching about guest pastebinsโฆ and it comes to rest at the feet of a person that uses a named one?
Not understanding this.
Don't know. haven't heard all sides of the story, but it seems like there's a push to make bakers get a pastebin account specifically.
Not happening with this baker.
might be because since the bins are completely gone, there's no way to say it isn't a guest.