kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 400172 Sept. 3, 2020, 4:51 p.m. No.24152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4155 >>4156 >>4195 >>4225

>>24151

 

warrom started being in the dough sometime this summer.

 

in arpil and may there wgere several attempts by grbil/svrl/etc to get the endchan one in the dough.

 

I have been targetted by this group, so I chose to stop baking until it settled out.

 

looks like today is the day.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 400172 Sept. 3, 2020, 5:02 p.m. No.24173   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4180 >>4388

>>24169

 

this is the same bullshit draama that went on in May. the only difference, literally, is they are staging from freenode instead of endchan, targetting bakers they think will cave, you know..

 

Shit you'd expect an ally not to do.

 

They vetrayed my trust, personally by doing that.

I had to go back and forth with another /qr/ baker for a mnth.

 

so no, I do not trust them, or their board.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 400172 Sept. 3, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.24183   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4187

>>24171

 

do you think anons want to keep sending people to /warroom/ to be phished on freenode?

 

It's up to the anons. npt me, not matter how much I think the /warrooom/ line inside the warroom section sucks a dick.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 400172 Sept. 3, 2020, 6:31 p.m. No.24364   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>24355

 

it comes with the turf. In my experience:

Anons will put up with it if you can deliver what you say. to a point.

 

All the more reason for anyone doing it to be at the top of their game. No ego. Anons will reject it,.

Problem is one of point of view. The second you let ego get in the way of anons, you are on the losing end of the argument.

 

They thought it was okay to disrespect anons. I didn't like that.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 400172 Sept. 3, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.24441   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4451 >>4453

>>24424

 

A combination of a lack of 2+ hour timeslots, and a desire to watch community boards after seeing wr-gensis suggest trying to get me to add their board to section 3 in notes on july 20.

 

This nmade me super suspicious, so after that I only baked when I figured WR anons weren't around.

 

I baked once on the 3rd, then a double bake on the 6th.

 

I literally only baked on the 16th because doc was dying on the field.

kekbees !!!ZDVkOGZmZmJjZDFm ID: 400172 Sept. 3, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.24458   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4462 >>4464

>>24451

>Would telling them to get lost and to ask when there's a full house, that you're not going to make a big change like that overnight, help? Or too much hassle as well?

 

I felt that due to my previous statements in their stream, that my position would not have been understood at that time. so I would've been in a lose-lose situation.

 

Things are more apparent now. as far as that goes, they got it in the dough without me.

So that part of it is over. Now anons have seen for themselves.

 

I felt that saying anything before other anons complained, would not have been any help.

 

So I chose restraint.

Anonymous ID: 400172 Sept. 7, 2020, 11:24 a.m. No.24613   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4615

>>24430

> Need to get with you at some point.

 

No offense, due to the current climate of /qr/, and frankly the community boards as a whole, this anon will remain as an individual, baking for anons, on /qresearch/ only at this time.

 

Thank you for your understanding. o7