Hopefully im in the right place.
>Who or what is ABCDULMNOP?
>mebbe you can give a little rundown
>we always have several things going at once here, several conversations, so not a problem
ABCU keep strying to pull people to them. BUT I see that as much free speech as anyone, including ebot and Mr Pig. WR on the other hand is actively attempting to subvert us and is in the dough. I have two screenshots, but they arent mine, rather provided to me, in bread, as examples if you want to see them.
>>ABCDULMNOP?
>Is that the guy who always uses the royal "we" when posting here and on /meta/?
Kek, my specific insult, but I dont know about meta. Its the homeless walmart camping widow washer in colorado I believe.
>What exactly is he doing? Is that specifically him namefagging WAR ROOM when "taking notes for baker" (or whatever)? He has always had followers as well.
Again, my concern is not that he posts. I support his posting. What I object to is them bibng in the dough AND that notables (4 today of the same notable) get added. They advertise either in name or within the body and that makes em not anon. Bakers put em in even when told.
>bakers are tired of WR wanting changes to dough, nagging to get all his posts in notables all he time, he's pain and persistent, as was said, there was hi-jacking of breads and dupes by that crew, no bakers friend, as you aren't a baker I'd like to understand what your gripe is with him
I understand better than you can imagine. I am not uneducated in this type of thing. However I ONCE had someone come to me who calmly layed out the things that were concerning him (or her, they were allowed there). I never knowingly heard from them again. However it always stuck with me.
>I baked 7 hours today, he hit me up once
>he knows once is enough for me, is that a problem, once a shift?
Wouldnt phase me at all if it was done as anon. But its not. He demands credit and that is fair to those who stay anon in what way?
And for full disclosure, I am also the one who has several times refused to give up breads when they get hijacked…..
I have said my peace Bakers. Thank you, but my task is finished. What you do with this is up to you as always.
>>Bakers put em in even when told.
>Bakers are caught in the crossfire.
>>Ignoring or blocking him [gerbil] sets his ass on fire
>Right - and then he (or they) start hijacking breads. In April, did it when Q was posting a lot. Real mess.
>yes - and that's a problem.
Again, I completely understand. Honestly I do. Been there done that, wouldnt wish it on anyone running a board, even a board dedicated to knitting and cats.
>>10518476 (You)
I saw it once today, notabled once
you got a problem with endchan take it up with him
bakers just watch posts
DSB love
To me it is not unlike the warning one of the founding fathers gave about treaties with foreign countries. Or something like that. Again no woman to my right.
>>>24150 (You)
>You may have said your peace but how do we solve the problems?
The ONLY thing that has any meaning is to remove them from the dough. Nothing stops them from namefagging, just as abculmnop.
We dont have to make em look like its a supported friend.
>>>24159 (You)
>"promoting" - no.
>No baker promotes War Room. Bakers just try to live with them so they don't sabotage the dough. Kitch has zero leverage - and almost no support from BO/BVs. We cannot change that. So some other solution must be found.
You will understand my beliefs prior to this conversation. I know of no BV or even BO and frankly for that I am glad. Keeps my thoughts clear.
>we talking WR? THe Abc whatever or WRTN?
ABCU would be the proper name. Also no more than ebot or Mr Pig.
>If that is so, need to provide the post number
>so baker can verify
>makes it easy
I had the previous three times Three? Perhaps safer to say two. More than once! kek
>if EC posts in a bread of mine… anons will have to nom it.
If this is the solution that best fits everyone, bakers absolutely included, then I am grateful for it.
>Sorry to hear this.
>We need to find a solution.
I guess to me, a middle ground would look like this:
No notables from anyone promoting them
If The Almighty hisself shows up there, still none.
Anons arent notableing him anyway. The rest I and whoever else said they would be here but isnt, will have to be ok with the rest.
Hows that sound?
>it is repeated so often, and in same bred at times.
>They pissed in the bed so they must lay in it imo.
>I think most anons who have been around long enough understand it's outside.
>Wasn't a total douche then my stance would be different.
As I said, that was my middle ground thoughts, not at all what I was shooting for. Kek
>anons are wanting warroom taken out of dough altogether
>don't know if they think that will solve the problem or not
No, the problem wont be solved. Truth of the matter is that this issue cannot be solved. Not as long as a bread can be hijacked.
The best it would do, total removal, is prevent any new anons from thinking they are an offshoot of us.
>>>24172 (You)
>New system of self-id for bakers makes it easier to avoid handing off to sketchy-seeming bakers. Not foolproof tho.
>Generally, the harder anon pushes on me, the harder i push back.
Watched you do that, admired it and your restraint as well.
>I also must tread a fine line with any suggestions to bred because I don't produce it-I know my place/role and am habby with it as there is little to be done about the reasons (bandwidth, shitty comp)
Your fine line is a highway to me. I am simply anon.
No wait, I am BreadPirate anon now as well!
I bid you all good eve Bakers and thank you for allowing the conversation.
BreadPirate (kek) out!
Is there anybody out there?
For the anonbin, do you have to setup an account and stuff?
www2.qanonbin.com
Could have! I thank you for the answer nontheless!
Cant create a thread here at comms, just a heads up.
I was wrong, a script held it up. Carry on!