newsbaker !!dJRrnQVXqg ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 5:15 p.m. No.33095   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hi everyone. I have been mostly watching this shit show from the sidelines, apart from keeping wearethene.ws updates suspended while anons and bakers hopefullywork togetherto resolve this situation.

 

In the relatively small amount of time I've been around this week I have seen, on one side, OSS and his cronies shilling the board with ridiculous accusations that are repeated until they become "truth" for many anons. Shills that were already present on the board like parasites of course latch on to these. On the other side, I have seen the "regular" crew of bakers refuse to accept anything that remotely looks like anon consensus and repeatedly bake split breads.

 

I know that most bakers are baking because they want to help provide a better source of information or at least a different perspective than the fully compromised MSM for anons and normies alike.

 

The thing is, this only works when anons and bakers are unified, and unfortunately you've been outwitted by someone who is an expert in the very same information warfare tactics that are currently used against the general population!

 

For every anon that reads the boards, there are 10 normies that read our notables on wearethene.ws, twitter, and so on. These are workfagging anons, anons' moms, and others. To me it's a shame that we haven't been able to produce anything that is worth putting in front of them for the past week, because it makes a real difference!

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 6:02 p.m. No.33171   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33141

Yep, basically.

 

>>33104

>Would it be (1) possible and (2) desirable to make code changes on wearthene.ws so that notables from ALL breads would appear, even ones with duplicate numbers?

Would be possible, but probably not desirable, because it would allow shills to inject notables easily.

The site's code is pretty carefully tuned to look for signals of fuckery in the kitchen (split breads being one of them) and require manual review in those situations. The board is currently not in a state where the notables being collected are acceptable so I think this is the best option. I'll be updating as much as I can tonight though.

 

>>33126

>I am also here to see what I can do to help besides bake.

Call out this bullshit as you see it on the main board!

If someone is shilling some graphic about "X said Y and Z and therefore they are AFLB" then look and see whether it's actually true.

The "bomb threat" graphic is one of the most ridiculous things I've seen in all of my 17 years in qresearch. Way too many anons bought it hook line and sinker and the new "bakers" shilled it repeatedly in the notables.

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 6:06 p.m. No.33182   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33176

My advice (for what it's worth): delete/ban repeated spam, but not just opposing opinions, even if they are being a complete and utter asshole about it to the point of offending you personally.

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 6:25 p.m. No.33234   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33186

>>33190

I meant when moderating this board, not when baking.

I'm not feeling any particular desire to bake right now either though.

 

>>33220

>Have a suggestion that might be helpful and create a neutral territory

If this is a thread on /qresearch/ then it is just going to get shilled into oblivion until BO finally locks/deletes it. /qrb/ maybe?

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 6:27 p.m. No.33238   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33227

>Some anon refers to IET17 as "The Doc"

>>IET17 is well known BAKER

One of these things is not like the other

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 6:32 p.m. No.33250   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33241

The attached graphic PROVES that you are a faggot. Why would it exist otherwise? Dispute it and further prove how much of a faggot you are, I dare you!

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 6:36 p.m. No.33258   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33251

Actually this is the worst one of all of them.

Post your proof that /qresearch/ ID 272f25 is the same as /comms/ ID 1e6739 or stop your tavistock bullshit.

newsbaker !!IcCEmB4cYM ID: 6e26cf Oct. 8, 2020, 7:38 p.m. No.33395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>33258

>Post your proof that /qresearch/ ID 272f25 is the same as /comms/ ID 1e6739 or stop your tavistock bullshit.

Still waiting.