Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 4:26 p.m. No.38644   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8654 >>8698 >>0365

>>38627

> The dough: https://pastebin.com/YJRV2a4X

>>38626

>…thoughts?

ok… deep breath. not sure how to say this…

preambule: anon, i'm not even exagerating saying i fucking LOVE you, and your work. i'm one of those who have more than once fought for them, and their room in the dough.

but it pains me to say, but i'm not sure having the full post by post list back is realistic. We can have them in there without giving flank to the very predictable (and overdone already) attack that it's too long. Let's not help them tear them apart again.

I'd be way more than down to have more than a line, if not a reminder of Q himself to point out WHY THEY ARE THERE, but the full list… sheesh, i dunno.

 

*as for internationals, i was one who thought/hoped having them there would motivate anons to have their own, and be active.

i have no indication it ever worked or served its purpose, and the threads that ARE active (germany, UK) don't seem to need any help. So that i'd be fine seeing go.

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 4:38 p.m. No.38659   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8670 >>8692

>>38654

> re-building

welp, i'm an easy pushover for that. Especially if it also brings back the EST set as well.

Can you believe shills are out there saying those are "old anyway bro" and "not updated since july so obvs no one cares" and vomit-inducing garbage like that?

oh, to smack them with the fact you NEVER STOPPED…..

wew

 

but yeah, i won't be hard to convince that's worth a fight

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 4:47 p.m. No.38681   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>0365

>>38676

>but on a board like this, how do you keep someone out?

>and if you do, on what basis?

phew, talking about crux.

 

first reaction:

1-you don't, at first.

2-on the basis of proven fuckery and malicious practices.

now it seems pretty clear to me OSS has more than gotten his diploma on that front, but even before the question of enforcement pops up, the judgement has not much to rest on.

we've seen how sadly easy to prop up some appearance of "consensus" (always hated appeals to that)…

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 4:56 p.m. No.38698   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>38644

> if not a reminder of Q himself to point out WHY THEY ARE THERE

rebumping this idea.

basically same principle as "notables are not endorsements"… a reminder.

 

Graphic is necessary and vital.

or anyone of those

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 4:58 p.m. No.38705   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>38700

>why cant the board operator delete the duplicate breads shills are setting up?

 

…

 

>>38688

>Fastjack, our captain, has supported the recent bakery takeover. He has pinned the other kitchen meta without discussion, knowing we already have one, has coninuously locked threads not made by the new crew, and has historically expressed his disdain and hate for those who choose to serve by baking at QR.

>Why Fastjack chose to 'pin' one of them is incomprehensible.

<incomprehensible.

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 5:07 p.m. No.38732   🗄️.is đź”—kun

welp, i'm not one to see it as proof, but considering OSS's point of view:

 

>>>/qresearch/11222760

 

>DO NOT WASTE THIS BREAD, I CREATED IT ONLY FOR Q TO POST IN IF THEY CHOOSE TO. NO ONE IS COLLECTING NOTABLES HERE. I AM A GHOST

 

then, again, by his standard, it went against him

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 5:29 p.m. No.38803   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8902

>>38794

>Sorry

nono, don't be, that's what i was trying to say… you felt it a failure but that allowed them to show themselves further accelerating the return to something more normal, so all good in the end.

sorry for the aggravation to you - made it out alive and still with us, so all good for another battle when it'll come. don't push yourself too much, many others before you have and it was sad to lose them

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 5:37 p.m. No.38819   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8877

>>38813

>What course of action would make sense?

well, optimistic but this fresh bread has started with a nice cheering mood, seems, let's hope anons&bakers can just refocus and not get drawn back in all the drama…

as Q has said, and others reminded, Transparency, crucial.

The light reveals…

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 5:38 p.m. No.38823   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8830

the narrative, update

 

>>>/qresearch/11224517

>Believe it or not anons, shit is getting worked out. So far Q, CM and BO have all acknowledged the Comms problems. BO has to step up. Q said it and CM said it. The 'Leadership' of QR has issues and OSS has extensively documented the misbehaving.

>Till then we have one bread and 12 days. BO has to step up. Anons will be anons. The problem is clearly in Comms.

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 5:54 p.m. No.38858   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>38856

i mean, we pretty much always had a few loons around, but i was pleasantly surprised it wasn't that much… i guess the complexity of operating the chan, even though not that bad, is enough of a first rampart already

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 5:57 p.m. No.38864   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8870

>>>/qresearch/11225063

>Thanks I'm working on finding more vetted manpower for the BV team right now. For those wondering why I haven't responded all day, the cat is already out of the bag, I work graveyard shift nearly every day at my irl job so that's when I'm up and working on the board.

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 7:10 p.m. No.39017   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9021 >>9022 >>9023 >>9030

announcement

 

>>>/qresearch/11227964 BO

>I have added 4 BV accounts. it will take time for the new BV's to be trained and they will make the occasional mistake so bear with us during the break in process. These are people I have gotten to know over the course of 2020 or longer so I have high confidence they will not abuse the position. because a lot of folks don't know how to find it here is the list.

>

>Oh before I forget 8bit is helping too which should help me get the new guys trained faster.

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 7:21 p.m. No.39039   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9062 >>9067

more

 

>>>/qresearch/11228479 BO

>I want to address a couple things.

>I plan to be here through trumps second term.

>I will not hire any bakers period. not from comms and not from any other group. I think the separation between BO/BV and anons is important, we should be taking a back seat to the action and just doing cleanup.

>None of the BVs are from the old team save for myself and 8bit.

>I'm glad you guys like the names I had fun making them.

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 22, 2020, 7:28 p.m. No.39048   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>9061

>>39047

Think i saw that one go by. Pardon the ackchully, but technically a BO or BV can just post as anon any time, as well.

Only with an honest transparency ethos will they only use their trip. Although, it's debatable that they're allowed the anon experience as well - i'd say as long as it doesn't touch on any conflict of interest

Anonymous ID: 9f49d8 Oct. 23, 2020, 3:45 a.m. No.39296   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>39250

>OSS is the biggest comms baker.

true.

 

posts here all the time

>>39202

>>39202

> Q posted away from your breads 17 days straight, the board owner or bv locked a non-comms bread and Q still chose to go to a moldy bread to post.

you "forget" parts to that anyway.

enjoy yourself, other's won't