I've been wondering how best to make use of the opportunity set before me with posts like
any suggestions?
aside from pointing out the obvious that anon ca530d is not contributing anything of value, quite the opposite in fact.
you need to repeat the following until you understand it
grant me the courage to change the things I can change
grant me the serenity to live with the things I cannot change
and please grant me the wisdom to know the difference
>How do you tell what is notable and what is not?
this is the crux of baking
the editorial discretion to pick notables
each baker, being an individual will have different results when asked to pick a list of notables from a bread.
for me it should be
A. relevant to the Q research subjects
B. have source
C. have summary text
D. have relevant graphic
sometimes something is notable that doesn't quite fit
I personally avoid the jewish subjects unless it's recent and very relevant because it just stirs up too much shit whenever something on that particular subject is posted as a notable.
>You're telling new bakers to "avoid the jewish subjects".
read what I posted again
>I personally avoid the jewish subjects unless it's recent and very relevant
that is not a prohibition on posting kike crimes
I just prefer not to rehash the same old shit over and over and over like finklestein
I'm not seeing any new threads created.
here at /comms/ is the place to try
it's why I made this place to practice
to try new things
>need lots of practice.
that is why /comms/ is here
practice to your hearts content
practice for speed
how fast can you post the bread ?
less than 60 seconds is possible
due to 8kun formatting 3 hyphens get converted into a single โ and the lengths do vary according to browser