Thanks very much for setting up this thread!
>When people add the "baker change" lines to the notables this shouldn't cause an issue. Be careful not to add any blank lines in the middle of a notables bun though.
Many, many thanks for the clarification. Baker here. "Baker change" matters to bakers bc it's important to know who is responsible for what in each bake. Somebody said, oh we can't do that any more bc is messes up the aggregators. Glad it doesn't.
I know you guise don't like buns but never heard about "baker change" problems. Sounds like there aren't any, kek.
RE buns:
Yes, i still use them sometimes. Used them a lot for Rusty's photos last spring, for example. But here is what i do now: If a bun is really needed, I make one up. But in most buns (not photos but other kinds), there are just one or two super substantive posts. So i will put the two "key" posts first, followed by the bun link:
>>33486, >>33996, >33998 Notre Dame DIGG
where
>>33486, >>33996 = super substantive posts
>>33998 = bun link
that way, wearethene.ws readers get most of the "meat"
but i can also include secondary info (details, anon discussions, etc.)
Appreciate your feedback on this, bc we currently have a baking class and we're about to talk about notables. If you have anything to share about how bakers can supports wearethene.ws in their notes–and you want bakers to see it soon–reply in the latest bakers live class thread. We are in there a lot between class, so it's a good place to dialog.
literally the "next-door" thread at the moment.
will post >>7582 link there
(not sure i understand the example in >>7569)